Technology area: Networking & Security
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 4 patents granted in the last 365 days
Marbeuf Conseil Et Recherche has 1 pending office action in the Networking & Security technology area. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, SHAW, BRIAN F, in 1 distinct art unit. SHAW, BRIAN F is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, holding 1 pending office action.
The current prosecution profile is very streamlined, with only one active matter. The focus on 1 distinct art unit suggests the technology falls into a specific networking or security category. With only 1 pending office action, the company can provide a targeted response to the examiner's findings.
The alignment of the technology area with the specific art unit suggests that the application is being reviewed by a specialist in networking systems. This allows for a concentrated effort to resolve the pending matter. The limited number of pending actions suggests a highly manageable prosecution pipeline at this stage. This focus ensures that the applicant can provide a comprehensive and detailed response to the examiner's findings.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| SHAW, BRIAN F | 1 | 73.6% | +16.7% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18789213 | METHOD FOR CERTIFYING THE GEOLOCATION OF A RECEIVER | SHAW, BRIAN F | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18789213 | METHOD FOR CERTIFYING THE GEOLOCATION OF A RECEIVER | SHAW, BRIAN F | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2432 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18789213 | METHOD FOR CERTIFYING THE GEOLOCATION OF A RECEIVER | SHAW, BRIAN F | 2432 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jul 30, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial