Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Marvin Behavioral Health Inc. currently has 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, TROTTER, SCOTT S, who is also the busiest examiner. The matter is being reviewed within 1 distinct art unit, which provides the specialized context for this application. This alignment indicates a concentrated prosecution environment where every recorded metric points to a single point of contact within the USPTO for the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems sector.
The busiest examiner, TROTTER, SCOTT S, is responsible for 1 pending office action. With only 1 distinct examiner involved, the company's current prosecution success is tied to a single individual's review process. This lack of examiner or art unit diversity means that the prosecution strategy does not need to account for varying examiner behaviors or departmental differences at this time. The focus remains entirely on the specific requirements of the assigned individual. For the practitioner, the 1 pending office action is the sole focus of current activity, and the historical data of the 1 distinct examiner is the only relevant metric for predicting the outcome within the 1 distinct art unit.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Double-patenting only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| TROTTER, SCOTT S | 1 | 63.1% | +14.3% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18976277 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MACHINE LEARNING-BASED STATE PREDICTION AND VISUALIZATION | TROTTER, SCOTT S | 51d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3696 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18976277 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MACHINE LEARNING-BASED STATE PREDICTION AND VISUALIZATION | TROTTER, SCOTT S | 3696 | DP | Final Rejection | 51d overdue | Pending | Dec 10, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial