Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Mavrik Inc.

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

3 pending office actions • 3 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Mavrik Inc. is currently navigating 3 pending office actions in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These actions are distributed across 3 distinct examiners and several distinct art units, showing that each pending matter is being evaluated in a different technical and personnel environment. This lack of overlap means that insights gained from one examiner may not directly apply to the other pending cases in the portfolio, requiring a tailored approach for each filing.

GORDON, ANNA L is the busiest examiner for Mavrik Inc., accounting for 1 pending office action. Since each of the distinct examiners holds a single pending action, the prosecution strategy is decentralized. Practitioners must prepare for different sets of examiner behaviors and art unit trends within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems field, as no single examiner or art unit dominates the current docket. This structure necessitates a broad monitoring strategy to track the separate paths of these applications.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (67%)
1
Medium (33%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (33%)
§103 only1 (33%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
GORDON, ANNA L 1 73.3% +30.2%
SCHOECH, ASHLEY TIFFANY 1 68.6% +23.5%
KOLOSOWSKI-GAGER, KATHERINE 1 27.0% +31.7%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18181366 Autonomous Drone System and Method KOLOSOWSKI-GAGER, KATHERINE 44d overdue
19045273 QUICK ATTACHMENT SYSTEM GORDON, ANNA L —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18181366 Autonomous Drone System and Method KOLOSOWSKI-GAGER, KATHERINE 44d overdue
19045273 QUICK ATTACHMENT SYSTEM GORDON, ANNA L —
18181382 Autonomous Drone System and Method SCHOECH, ASHLEY TIFFANY —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3642 1
3669 1
3687 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19045273 QUICK ATTACHMENT SYSTEM GORDON, ANNA L 3642 §102§103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Feb 04, 2025
18181382 Autonomous Drone System and Method SCHOECH, ASHLEY TIFFANY 3669 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Mar 09, 2023
18181366 Autonomous Drone System and Method KOLOSOWSKI-GAGER, KATHERINE 3687 §101§103 Non-Final OA 44d overdue Pending Mar 09, 2023

Managing Mavrik Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Mavrik Inc. have?

Mavrik Inc. has 3 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 3 art units and 3 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Mavrik Inc. applications?

Anna L Gordon has the most, with 1 of Mavrik Inc.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Mavrik Inc.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month