Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Mdi Co. Ltd.

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Mdi Co. Ltd. is active in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. The company currently has 1 pending office action. This workload is handled by 1 distinct examiner within 1 distinct art unit. This distribution indicates that the company's current patenting efforts are focused on a single point of review at the patent office.

The busiest examiner for this portfolio is KASHYAP, ESHA PRAKASH, who is responsible for 1 pending office action. Since there is 1 pending action in total, this examiner oversees the entire active prosecution profile. This singular focus means that the company's immediate patenting outcomes are tied to the specific interpretations of this one examiner.

The presence of 1 distinct art unit suggests that the subject matter of the pending application is specialized within Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering. There are no other examiners or art units involved to provide a comparative baseline for prosecution. This results in a streamlined but singular prosecution path for the company's current filings.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
0
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
KASHYAP, ESHA PRAKASH 1 100.0% +0.0%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18263645 ADAPTER KASHYAP, ESHA PRAKASH 35d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3783 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18263645 ADAPTER KASHYAP, ESHA PRAKASH 3783 §102§103 Final Rejection 35d Pending Jul 31, 2023

Managing Mdi Co. Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month