Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026

Metabolic Technologies, LLC

3 pending office actions • 3 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 30 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
3
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only3 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

3
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
PUTTLITZ, KARL J 1 69.1% +18.4%
CHONG, YONG SOO 1 43.7% +41.6%
NEAGU, IRINA 1 46.6% +57.9%

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17076493 METHOD OF ADMINISTERING BETA-HYDROXY-BETA-METHYLBUTYRATE (HMB) CHONG, YONG SOO 22d overdue
16952673 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF USE OF BETA-HYDROXY-BETA-METHYLBUTYRATE (HMB) FOR JOINT STABILITY PUTTLITZ, KARL J 10d overdue
15348149 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF USE OF BETA-HYDROXY-BETA-METHYLBUTYRATE (HMB) AS AN ANIMAL FEED ADDITIVE NEAGU, IRINA 28d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1646 1
1623 1
1629 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
16952673 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF USE OF BETA-HYDROXY-BETA-METHYLBUTYRATE (HMB) FOR JOINT STABILITY PUTTLITZ, KARL J 1646 §103 Final Rejection 10d overdue Pending Nov 19, 2020
17076493 METHOD OF ADMINISTERING BETA-HYDROXY-BETA-METHYLBUTYRATE (HMB) CHONG, YONG SOO 1623 §103 Non-Final OA 22d overdue Pending Oct 21, 2020
15348149 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF USE OF BETA-HYDROXY-BETA-METHYLBUTYRATE (HMB) AS AN ANIMAL FEED ADDITIVE NEAGU, IRINA 1629 §103 Final Rejection 28d Pending Nov 10, 2016

Managing Metabolic Technologies, LLC's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month