Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Micropore Technologies Limited

Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Chemistry & Materials

4 pending office actions • 3 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Micropore Technologies Limited maintains a company patent portfolio within the Chemistry & Materials sector. Currently, the portfolio includes 3 pending office actions. This workload is handled by 3 distinct examiners, including HUANG, RYAN, who is the busiest examiner with 1 busiest examiner pending action. All prosecution activity is localized within 3 distinct art units.

For a practitioner, this distribution means the company's current USPTO engagement is spread across several technical channels. The 3 pending office actions represent the entirety of the active pipeline. Navigating the Chemistry & Materials field with 3 distinct examiners allows for a distributed approach to prosecution. However, it also means the portfolio's immediate growth depends on the resolution of the 1 busiest examiner pending action. Practitioners should tailor their strategy specifically to the tendencies of HUANG, RYAN to optimize outcomes within the 3 distinct art units.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
2
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 30 days (2)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (50%)
2
Medium (50%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (25%)
Double-patenting + other1 (25%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

3
Life Sciences
75% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
1
Business / Other
25% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
KAMM, JUDITH MARIE 1 43.5% +56.6%
HUANG, RYAN 1 52.9% +31.1%
SHOMER, ISAAC 1 63.2% +30.4%
BASS, DIRK R 1 62.4% +22.8%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17927497 MEMBRANE EMULSIFICATION APPARATUS WITH REFINER AND METHOD OF PREPARING A REFINED EMULSION BASS, DIRK R 12d
18016143 METHOD OF PREPARING LIPID VESICLES SHOMER, ISAAC 20d

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18018078 METHODS OF PREPARING SOLID PARTICULATE MATERIALS HUANG, RYAN 107d overdue
17927497 MEMBRANE EMULSIFICATION APPARATUS WITH REFINER AND METHOD OF PREPARING A REFINED EMULSION BASS, DIRK R 12d
18016143 METHOD OF PREPARING LIPID VESICLES SHOMER, ISAAC 20d
18998271 CONTINUOUS PROCESS KAMM, JUDITH MARIE —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1777 1
1612 1
1779 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18998271 CONTINUOUS PROCESS KAMM, JUDITH MARIE — §102§103§112DP Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 24, 2025
18018078 METHODS OF PREPARING SOLID PARTICULATE MATERIALS HUANG, RYAN 1777 §103 Final Rejection 107d overdue Pending Jan 26, 2023
18016143 METHOD OF PREPARING LIPID VESICLES SHOMER, ISAAC 1612 §103§112 Non-Final OA 20d Pending Jan 13, 2023
17927497 MEMBRANE EMULSIFICATION APPARATUS WITH REFINER AND METHOD OF PREPARING A REFINED EMULSION BASS, DIRK R 1779 §102§103 Non-Final OA 12d Pending Nov 23, 2022

Managing Micropore Technologies Limited's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month