Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Millow Holding AB manages a patent portfolio in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. The current data indicates a narrow prosecution footprint, with 1 pending office action across the entire portfolio. This 1 pending office action suggests that the company's current interactions with the USPTO are highly centralized.
The portfolio's activity is restricted to 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. The busiest examiner identified in the data is KIM, BRYAN, who is currently handling 1 pending office action. This concentration within 1 distinct art unit implies that the subject matter of the pending application is technically focused within the Chemistry & Materials field.
For a patent practitioner, the presence of 1 distinct examiner means that the prosecution strategy does not need to account for divergent examiner behaviors. The fact that KIM, BRYAN is the only examiner with a pending action simplifies the communication and negotiation process. This focused approach allows for a more targeted response to the 1 pending office action currently on the docket for Millow Holding AB.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| KIM, BRYAN | 1 | 28.4% | +36.8% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18558029 | A METHOD AND A SYSTEM FOR MANUFACTURING A PROTEIN-RICH BIOMASS COMPRISNG EDIBLE FILAMENTOUS FUNGUS | KIM, BRYAN | 42d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18558029 | A METHOD AND A SYSTEM FOR MANUFACTURING A PROTEIN-RICH BIOMASS COMPRISNG EDIBLE FILAMENTOUS FUNGUS | KIM, BRYAN | 42d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1792 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18558029 | A METHOD AND A SYSTEM FOR MANUFACTURING A PROTEIN-RICH BIOMASS COMPRISNG EDIBLE FILAMENTOUS FUNGUS | KIM, BRYAN | 1792 | §103§112 | Final Rejection | 42d | Pending | Oct 30, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial