Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Mitre Corporation

Technology areas: Computing & Software • Communications • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

3 pending office actions • 3 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Mitre Corporation is currently managing 3 pending office actions in the Computing & Software technology area. These actions are spread across 3 distinct art units, indicating that the company's software-related filings cover a variety of technical classifications and are subject to 3 different examination standards. This distribution reflects a broad technical scope within the company's current computing and software innovations.

The prosecution involves 3 distinct examiners, with each of the 3 pending office actions assigned to a different individual. BONZO, BRYCE P is identified as the busiest examiner, though they are responsible for only 1 pending office action. This distribution shows that the company's current workload is evenly divided among several examiners and art units, with no 1 person or department dominating the prosecution landscape. For practitioners, this requires a management strategy that can handle 3 separate dialogues with different examiners across 3 different technical areas. The lack of concentration in 1 art unit or under 1 examiner means that the company must be prepared for a diverse range of feedback and requirements within the Computing & Software sector.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other2 (67%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
1
Information Tech
33% of docket
1
Communications
33% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
33% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
BONZO, BRYCE P 1 83.7% -16.9%
KHATIB, RAMI 1 77.0% +13.7%
BEAMER, TEMICA M 1 88.5% +4.1%

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18934930 Method and System for Dynamically Navigating Routes According to Safety-Related Risk Profiles KHATIB, RAMI 22d
18951018 Characterizing Fault Injection on Power Distribution Networks with Voltage Sensors BONZO, BRYCE P 61d
18367831 Systems and Methods for Enforcing Access Traffic Steering, Switching, and Splitting (ATSSS) Functionality in the IP Layer BEAMER, TEMICA M —

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18934930 Method and System for Dynamically Navigating Routes According to Safety-Related Risk Profiles KHATIB, RAMI 22d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2114 1
3669 1
2646 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18951018 Characterizing Fault Injection on Power Distribution Networks with Voltage Sensors BONZO, BRYCE P 2114 §101§102§103§112Other Non-Final OA 61d Pending Nov 18, 2024
18934930 Method and System for Dynamically Navigating Routes According to Safety-Related Risk Profiles KHATIB, RAMI 3669 §101§103Other Final Rejection 22d Pending Nov 01, 2024
18367831 Systems and Methods for Enforcing Access Traffic Steering, Switching, and Splitting (ATSSS) Functionality in the IP Layer BEAMER, TEMICA M 2646 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Sep 13, 2023

Managing Mitre Corporation's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Mitre Corporation have?

Mitre Corporation has 3 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 3 art units and 3 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Mitre Corporation applications?

Bryce P Bonzo has the most, with 1 of Mitre Corporation's pending office actions.

What technology area are Mitre Corporation's patent applications in?

Mostly Computing & Software (USPTO Tech Center 2100), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month