Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 26, 2026

Mitsubishi Chemical Advanced Materials Japan Ltd.

Technology area: Chemistry & Materials

2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Mitsubishi Chemical Advanced Materials Japan Ltd. has 2 pending office actions in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. These actions are distributed across 2 distinct art units and involve 2 distinct examiners.

THOMPSON, CAMIE S is the busiest examiner, handling 1 pending office action. This represents a portion of the 2 total pending actions. The use of 2 distinct examiners ensures that each matter is reviewed independently. Each examiner manages 1 action.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
2
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
THOMPSON, CAMIE S 1 73.7% +10.5%
SHAH, SAMIR 1 36.7% +35.1%

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19182561 LAMINATE THOMPSON, CAMIE S —
18286674 Stampable Sheet and Molded Body Using Same SHAH, SAMIR —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1789 1
1787 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19182561 LAMINATE THOMPSON, CAMIE S 1789 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 17, 2025
18286674 Stampable Sheet and Molded Body Using Same SHAH, SAMIR 1787 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 12, 2023

Managing Mitsubishi Chemical Advanced Materials Japan Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Mitsubishi Chemical Advanced Materials Japan Ltd. have?

Mitsubishi Chemical Advanced Materials Japan Ltd. has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 2 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Mitsubishi Chemical Advanced Materials Japan Ltd. applications?

Camie S Thompson has the most, with 1 of Mitsubishi Chemical Advanced Materials Japan Ltd.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Mitsubishi Chemical Advanced Materials Japan Ltd.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Chemistry & Materials (USPTO Tech Center 1700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month