Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Mjolnir Spaceworks Co. Ltd. currently manages 1 pending office action within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This single action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner and is located within 1 distinct art unit. Such a concentration indicates a highly focused prosecution footprint for the company's current filings in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering sector.
GARDNER, NICOLE is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, holding 1 busiest examiner pending office action. This figure of 1 matches the total count of pending office actions reported for the company. Because there is only a single distinct examiner and a single distinct art unit, the interaction with the patent office is streamlined under a single point of review. GARDNER, NICOLE handles all current activity for the portfolio.
The presence of the pending office action suggests a specific technical focus for Mjolnir Spaceworks Co. Ltd. With the distinct examiner and the distinct art unit involved, the company faces a singular administrative path. This busiest examiner pending action managed by GARDNER, NICOLE defines the current scope of prosecution, ensuring that all legal and technical efforts are directed through one channel at the patent office.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| GARDNER, NICOLE | 1 | 69.1% | +14.5% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18558883 | CONTAINER AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING CONTAINER | GARDNER, NICOLE | 84d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3753 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18558883 | CONTAINER AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING CONTAINER | GARDNER, NICOLE | 3753 | §103 | Final Rejection | 84d overdue | Pending | Nov 03, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial