Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Mjr Controls Limited

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Mjr Controls Limited has 2 pending office actions within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The portfolio is divided between 2 distinct art units, showing that each pending matter resides in a different administrative division. Prosecution involves 2 distinct examiners, ensuring that each case is reviewed by a different official. This structure suggests that the company's current legal challenges are not concentrated under a single point of authority within the patent office.

JONES, JODI MARIE is designated as the busiest examiner, with 1 pending office action under her review. Since there are 2 pending actions and 2 distinct examiners, the workload is split. This structure indicates that no examiner or art unit dominates the current prosecution landscape for the company. Practitioners must manage 2 separate examiner relationships to resolve the 2 pending office actions currently on the docket. This 2-examiner environment requires consistent messaging across the 2 distinct art units.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
1
Medium (50%)
1
Easy (50%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (50%)
§112 only1 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
JONES, JODI MARIE 1 70.4% +9.1%
SOTO, HENRIX 1 71.2% +31.3%

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18838782 ADAPTIVE TENSION COMPENSATOR SYSTEM FOR OFFSHORE CHARGING OPERATIONS BETWEEN A VESSEL AND AN OFFSHORE POWER STATION SOTO, HENRIX —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3666 1
3654 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19127192 ASSISTED DYNAMIC POSITION CONTROL OF A CHARGING VESSEL JONES, JODI MARIE 3666 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending May 05, 2025
18838782 ADAPTIVE TENSION COMPENSATOR SYSTEM FOR OFFSHORE CHARGING OPERATIONS BETWEEN A VESSEL AND AN OFFSHORE POWER STATION SOTO, HENRIX 3654 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 15, 2024

Managing Mjr Controls Limited's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month