Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
1 pending office actions • 0 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Momax Technology (Shenzhen) Co. Ltd. maintains a patent portfolio with 1 pending office action. This prosecution activity involves 1 distinct examiner. The data shows that there are 0 distinct art units listed for this portfolio. The company's current patenting efforts are concentrated on 1 active matter under review by the patent office. This indicates a very specific prosecution strategy. The absence of multiple pending actions suggests a selective filing approach at this time. This concentration allows the company to focus its legal resources on a single pending matter.
The busiest examiner for the company is MCFARLAND, DANIEL PATRICK, who is assigned 1 pending office action. This examiner has 1 busiest examiner pending case, which represents the total number of pending actions for the entire portfolio. This indicates that MCFARLAND, DANIEL PATRICK is the only examiner currently interacting with the company's filings. Because there is only 1 distinct examiner, the company's immediate patent outcomes depend entirely on the decisions of this 1 individual. Practitioners should focus on the specific tendencies of this 1 examiner to manage the current prosecution effectively. The data reflects a portfolio that is not currently experiencing broad or diverse prosecution activity across the patent office.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCFARLAND, DANIEL PATRICK | 1 | 27.8% | +1.3% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18284551 | MOBILE CHARGING DEVICE | MCFARLAND, DANIEL PATRICK | — |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18284551 | MOBILE CHARGING DEVICE | MCFARLAND, DANIEL PATRICK | — | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Sep 28, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial