Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Movella Inc. currently faces 1 pending office action within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This pending matter involves 1 distinct examiner and is situated within 1 distinct art unit. The portfolio's current activity is highly centralized, with no distribution across different examination divisions at the USPTO.
The busiest examiner for this applicant is CERIONI, DANIEL LEE, who is currently managing 1 pending office action. Given that the busiest examiner pending count is 1, there is no backlog or multiple-case pressure involving this specific examiner for Movella Inc. The prosecution strategy can be tailored specifically to the examiner's history and the specific requirements of the 1 distinct art unit involved.
With only 1 pending office action, the administrative overhead for this portfolio is limited. The alignment of the 1 distinct examiner with the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering space provides a clear and singular path for the applicant to resolve their current pending issues. This focused data set indicates a period of low-volume prosecution activity where each decision can be made with a focus on the 1 distinct art unit involved.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| CERIONI, DANIEL LEE | 1 | 64.5% | +28.0% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18332556 | REUSABLE EAR TAG | CERIONI, DANIEL LEE | 9d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18332556 | REUSABLE EAR TAG | CERIONI, DANIEL LEE | 9d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3791 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18332556 | REUSABLE EAR TAG | CERIONI, DANIEL LEE | 3791 | §103§112 | Final Rejection | 9d overdue | Pending | Jun 09, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial