Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Mp Zenrobotics OY has 1 pending office action in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This activity is localized to 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. RIVERA-CORDERO, ARLYN I is the busiest examiner for the company, with 1 pending office action.
With 1 pending office action currently active, the company is focused on a specific patent application within the Chemistry & Materials field. The assignment of this matter to 1 distinct examiner in 1 distinct art unit means the company is dealing with a single point of contact at the patent office. RIVERA-CORDERO, ARLYN I is the only examiner currently reviewing the company's pending claims. This concentrated prosecution environment allows for a direct and focused response to the 1 pending office action. Success in this 1 distinct art unit will be critical for the company's goals in this technology area.
Practitioners should recognize that the 1 distinct examiner, RIVERA-CORDERO, ARLYN I, holds total influence over the current pending portfolio. Because there is only 1 pending office action, the company can dedicate its full attention to the specific requirements of the Chemistry & Materials division. This streamlined approach minimizes the complexity often found in larger, more distributed portfolios.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| RIVERA-CORDERO, ARLYN I | 1 | 63.1% | +27.0% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18717813 | WASTE SORTING ROBOT AND EXTERNAL CLEANING APPARATUS | RIVERA-CORDERO, ARLYN I | 171d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1714 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18717813 | WASTE SORTING ROBOT AND EXTERNAL CLEANING APPARATUS | RIVERA-CORDERO, ARLYN I | 1714 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 171d overdue | Pending | Jun 07, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial