Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026

Musco Corporation

4 pending office actions • 4 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 16 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
3
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 30 days (3)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
3
Medium (75%)
1
Easy (25%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only3 (75%)
§112 only1 (25%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
1
Information Tech
25% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
25% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
50% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
FEREJA, SAMUEL D 1 74.9% +11.6%
TRAVERS, MATTHEW P 1 63.1% +44.1%
MASINICK, JONATHAN PETER 1 68.7% +33.7%
CATTANACH, COLIN J 1 59.1% +19.2%

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18417065 LENS FOR RETROFITTING A LIGHTING SYSTEM WITH LED LIGHTS CATTANACH, COLIN J 78d overdue
19048204 SYSTEM AND METHODS FOR MONITORING FACILITY POPULATION AND ACTIVITY FEREJA, SAMUEL D 15d
18426470 APPARATUS, METHOD, AND SYSTEM FOR PROVIDING MOBILE OR TEMPORARY FENCING MASINICK, JONATHAN PETER 15d
18851127 APPARATUS, METHOD, AND SYSTEM FOR FINE TUNING OF CAPTURE DEVICES TRAVERS, MATTHEW P 28d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2487 1
3726 1
3678 1
2875 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19048204 SYSTEM AND METHODS FOR MONITORING FACILITY POPULATION AND ACTIVITY FEREJA, SAMUEL D 2487 §103 Non-Final OA 15d Pending Feb 07, 2025
18851127 APPARATUS, METHOD, AND SYSTEM FOR FINE TUNING OF CAPTURE DEVICES TRAVERS, MATTHEW P 3726 §112 Non-Final OA 28d Pending Sep 26, 2024
18426470 APPARATUS, METHOD, AND SYSTEM FOR PROVIDING MOBILE OR TEMPORARY FENCING MASINICK, JONATHAN PETER 3678 §103 Non-Final OA 15d Pending Jan 30, 2024
18417065 LENS FOR RETROFITTING A LIGHTING SYSTEM WITH LED LIGHTS CATTANACH, COLIN J 2875 §103 Final Rejection 78d overdue Pending Jan 19, 2024

Managing Musco Corporation's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month