Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
My Life Kit Ltd. is currently navigating 2 pending office actions in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These actions are split between 2 distinct examiners and distinct art units. This distribution shows that even with a small number of active matters, the company is engaging with multiple administrative points within the patent office. This variety requires a more complex management approach than a portfolio with a single action, as the company must respond to different examiner styles and art unit interpretations simultaneously.
The busiest examiner, YONO, RAVEN E, is responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending action. Since the total workload is shared among multiple examiners, no individual holds a majority of the cases. This requires the company to manage separate prosecution tracks, where the progress of one application does not necessarily inform the strategy for the other. Practitioners should be prepared for divergent timelines and potentially different requirements for patentability across these distinct areas of the transportation and mechanical systems sector.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 2 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| YONO, RAVEN E | 1 | 38.9% | +33.6% |
| OUSSIR, EL MEHDI | 1 | 49.4% | +46.5% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18583774 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO AUTHENTICATE A USER’S FINANCIAL CREDENTIALS | YONO, RAVEN E | 150d overdue |
| 18410806 | SYSTEMS AND MEHTODS TO AUTHENTICATE A USER'S FINANCIAL CREDENTIALS | OUSSIR, EL MEHDI | 132d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18583774 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO AUTHENTICATE A USER’S FINANCIAL CREDENTIALS | YONO, RAVEN E | 150d overdue |
| 18410806 | SYSTEMS AND MEHTODS TO AUTHENTICATE A USER'S FINANCIAL CREDENTIALS | OUSSIR, EL MEHDI | 132d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3694 | 1 |
| 3699 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18583774 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO AUTHENTICATE A USER’S FINANCIAL CREDENTIALS | YONO, RAVEN E | 3694 | §101§103§112Other | Final Rejection | 150d overdue | Pending | Feb 21, 2024 |
| 18410806 | SYSTEMS AND MEHTODS TO AUTHENTICATE A USER'S FINANCIAL CREDENTIALS | OUSSIR, EL MEHDI | 3699 | §101§102§112 | Non-Final OA | 132d overdue | Pending | Jan 11, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial