Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Myenergi Limited is currently active in the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area. The portfolio contains 1 pending office action, which is assigned to 1 distinct examiner. This single pending matter is located within 1 distinct art unit, indicating a very narrow and focused prosecution profile at this time. Practitioners should note that this concentration allows for a very direct engagement with the patent office.
RODAK, LEE E is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, currently handling the 1 pending office action. For a company in the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics sector, this concentration means that the prosecution strategy is entirely dependent on the specific feedback from this one examiner. There are no other pending actions or examiners to provide a broader context for the company's current filings.
The alignment of 1 pending action with 1 distinct art unit suggests that the company's current intellectual property efforts are concentrated on a specific technical innovation. Practitioners should focus on the examination history of RODAK, LEE E to navigate the path to allowance. The simplicity of this examiner footprint allows for a highly specialized and direct response to the pending office action without the need to manage conflicting requirements.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| RODAK, LEE E | 1 | 72.2% | +34.1% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18722886 | DETECTION CIRCUITRY | RODAK, LEE E | 4d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18722886 | DETECTION CIRCUITRY | RODAK, LEE E | 4d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2858 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18722886 | DETECTION CIRCUITRY | RODAK, LEE E | 2858 | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | 4d overdue | Pending | Jun 21, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial