Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026

Nammi Therapeutics Inc.

Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals

6 pending office actions • 4 art units • 6 examiners • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Nammi Therapeutics Inc. currently manages 6 pending office actions within the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. These actions are distributed across 6 distinct examiners, suggesting a decentralized review process where each case is handled by a different individual. The portfolio is active in 4 distinct art units, indicating a focused but varied technical scope within the biotechnology field that spans several specialized examination groups.

CABRAL, ROBERT S is identified as the busiest examiner for the company. This examiner is responsible for 1 pending office action. Given that there are 6 distinct examiners for 6 pending actions, the workload is evenly spread, with no single examiner managing a disproportionate share of the portfolio. This distribution requires a prosecution strategy that addresses the specific tendencies of 6 different examiners.

The presence of 6 distinct examiners across 4 distinct art units means that some art units likely contain multiple examiners working on the company's applications. This concentration within art units may provide opportunities for consistent group-level arguments, even while addressing the specific preferences of individual examiners. The 1 pending office action assigned to the busiest examiner reflects the current one-to-one ratio of examiners to pending matters in this portfolio.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

6
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
2
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (17%)
3
Medium (50%)
2
Easy (33%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§112 only2 (33%)
Double-patenting + other3 (50%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (17%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

5
Life Sciences
83% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
1
Business / Other
17% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

60 h
Manual time on pending OAs
12 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
21 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.5 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
CABRAL, ROBERT S 1 62.6% +32.5%
DAVIS, BRIAN J 1 84.8% -4.0%
WEIDNER, ADAM M 1 63.5% +33.8%
WESTERBERG, NISSA M 1 23.4% +37.1%
STEINKE, SEAN JAMES 1 12.5% +42.9%
DENT, ALANA HARRIS 1 44.2% +32.0%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18831041 Formulated and/or Co-Formulated Nanocarrier Compositions Containing TFGß Antagonist Prodrugs Useful in the Treatment of Cancer and Methods Thereof DAVIS, BRIAN J 20d

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18445604 Formulated and/or Co-Formulated Liposome Compositions Containing Toll-Like Receptor ("TLR") Agonist Prodrugs Useful In The Treatment of Cancer and Methods Thereof C WESTERBERG, NISSA M 29d
17803774 Formulated and/or Co-Formulated Liposome Compositions Containing Immunogenic Cell Death (ICD) Inducing Prodrugs Useful In The Treatment of Cancer and Methods Thereof STEINKE, SEAN JAMES —

Interview Candidates (5)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18445604 Formulated and/or Co-Formulated Liposome Compositions Containing Toll-Like Receptor ("TLR") Agonist Prodrugs Useful In The Treatment of Cancer and Methods Thereof C WESTERBERG, NISSA M 29d
18751742 Formulated and/or Co-Formulated Liposome Compositions Containing PD-1 Antagonist Prodrugs Useful in the Treatment of Cancer and Methods Thereof CABRAL, ROBERT S —
18445651 Fusion Protein Composition(s) Comprising Masked Type I Interferons (IFNa and IFNb) For Use in the Treatment of Cancer and Methods Thereof WEIDNER, ADAM M —
17803774 Formulated and/or Co-Formulated Liposome Compositions Containing Immunogenic Cell Death (ICD) Inducing Prodrugs Useful In The Treatment of Cancer and Methods Thereof STEINKE, SEAN JAMES —
17803392 Fusion Protein Composition(S) Comprising Masked Type I Interferons (IFNa and IFNß) For Use in the Treatment of Cancer and Methods Thereof DENT, ALANA HARRIS —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1614 2
1618 1
1619 1
1643 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18751742 Formulated and/or Co-Formulated Liposome Compositions Containing PD-1 Antagonist Prodrugs Useful in the Treatment of Cancer and Methods Thereof CABRAL, ROBERT S 1614 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 24, 2024
18831041 Formulated and/or Co-Formulated Nanocarrier Compositions Containing TFGß Antagonist Prodrugs Useful in the Treatment of Cancer and Methods Thereof DAVIS, BRIAN J 1614 §112 Final Rejection 20d Pending May 13, 2024
18445651 Fusion Protein Composition(s) Comprising Masked Type I Interferons (IFNa and IFNb) For Use in the Treatment of Cancer and Methods Thereof WEIDNER, ADAM M — §102§103DP Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 11, 2023
18445604 Formulated and/or Co-Formulated Liposome Compositions Containing Toll-Like Receptor ("TLR") Agonist Prodrugs Useful In The Treatment of Cancer and Methods Thereof C WESTERBERG, NISSA M 1618 §103§112DP Final Rejection 29d Pending Nov 15, 2023
17803774 Formulated and/or Co-Formulated Liposome Compositions Containing Immunogenic Cell Death (ICD) Inducing Prodrugs Useful In The Treatment of Cancer and Methods Thereof STEINKE, SEAN JAMES 1619 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 17, 2022
17803392 Fusion Protein Composition(S) Comprising Masked Type I Interferons (IFNa and IFNß) For Use in the Treatment of Cancer and Methods Thereof DENT, ALANA HARRIS 1643 §102§112DP Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 17, 2022

Managing Nammi Therapeutics Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month