Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Nanowave Incorporated

Technology area: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Nanowave Incorporated focuses its company patent portfolio on the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area. The company currently has 1 pending office action. This action is being handled by 1 distinct examiner, JONATHAN M HANSEN.

The portfolio is active in 1 distinct art unit. JONATHAN M HANSEN is the busiest examiner for the company, with 1 busiest examiner pending office action currently under review. This data shows a concentrated prosecution effort within a single technical discipline.

For patent practitioners, the presence of 1 pending office action in the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics field under 1 examiner suggests a straightforward management task. The focus on a single art unit indicates that the company's current innovations are closely related within the semiconductor or optics space. This concentration allows for a more predictable prosecution timeline and a simplified communication structure between the firm and the patent office.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
0
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
1
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§102 only1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
100% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
HANSEN, JONATHAN M 1 79.4% +11.4%

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18774200 MOVEMENT MEASUREMENT SYSTEM WITH METHOD FOR REDUCING INTERPOLATION ERROR HANSEN, JONATHAN M 11d overdue

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2877 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18774200 MOVEMENT MEASUREMENT SYSTEM WITH METHOD FOR REDUCING INTERPOLATION ERROR HANSEN, JONATHAN M 2877 §102 Final Rejection 11d overdue Pending Jul 16, 2024

Managing Nanowave Incorporated's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month