Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days
Nasekomo B V currently has 2 pending office actions within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These 2 actions are assigned to 2 distinct examiners, which indicates that each active matter is being reviewed by a different individual. This distribution suggests that the company's Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems prosecution strategy involves managing separate examiner relationships simultaneously.
The pending office actions are categorized into 2 distinct art units, showing a lack of technical concentration despite the variety of examiners involved. PETERSON, ALANNA KAY is identified as the busiest examiner for the company, holding 1 busiest examiner pending action. Because there are 2 distinct examiners for the total actions, PETERSON, ALANNA KAY handles a portion of the overall workload. The presence of 1 busiest examiner pending action suggests that while the examiners are unique, their technical focus is spread across the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems sector.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §112 only | 1 (50%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| PETERSON, ALANNA KAY | 1 | 40.7% | +27.8% |
| GRABER, MARIA EILEEN | 1 | 62.2% | +32.2% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18679171 | Mobile workstation for soilless cultivation | PETERSON, ALANNA KAY | 44d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18679171 | Mobile workstation for soilless cultivation | PETERSON, ALANNA KAY | 44d overdue |
| 18548867 | PROCESS FOR BREEDING ADULT INSECTS | GRABER, MARIA EILEEN | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3642 | 1 |
| 3644 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18679171 | Mobile workstation for soilless cultivation | PETERSON, ALANNA KAY | 3642 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | 44d overdue | Pending | May 30, 2024 |
| 18548867 | PROCESS FOR BREEDING ADULT INSECTS | GRABER, MARIA EILEEN | 3644 | §112 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Sep 01, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial