Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

National Institute for Materials Science

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

5 pending office actions • 3 art units • 5 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 14 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

National Institute for Materials Science has 5 pending office actions in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. These actions are distributed across 3 distinct art units, indicating a focused but slightly varied technical classification for their materials-based applications. The institute is working with 5 distinct examiners, which means that every pending action is assigned to a different individual.

GONZALEZ RAMOS, MAYLA is the busiest examiner, with 1 pending office action currently assigned. With 5 examiners for 5 pending office actions, there is no concentration of workload with any single individual. Practitioners must manage 5 separate examiner relationships across 3 art units, requiring a strategy that accounts for the specific nuances of each examiner's review process and the standards of each unit.

The distribution of 5 pending office actions across 3 distinct art units suggests that the institute's intellectual property is technically diverse within the Chemistry & Materials sector. For a practitioner, the fact that every action is with a different examiner means there is no central point of contact to streamline the portfolio. Each of the 5 pending office actions must be prosecuted as an independent matter, with no opportunity to leverage a single examiner's understanding across multiple cases.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (60%)
2
Medium (40%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (20%)
Double-patenting + other1 (20%)
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (60%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
20% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
20% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
20% of docket
2
Business / Other
40% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
MOORE, DEVON TYLEN 1 48.9% +35.8%
FERGUSON, DION 1 87.0% +8.2%
DIETERLE, JENNIFER M 1 66.1% +27.2%
CARPENTER, JOSHUA S 1 51.9% +36.9%
BARZACH, JEFFREY EUGENE 1 57.1% +40.6%

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18686624 COBALT-CHROMIUM ALLOY MEMBER, METHOD OF PRODUCING THE SAME, AND DEVICE USING THE SAME CARPENTER, JOSHUA S 17d overdue
18996410 CO2 SEPARATION SYSTEM MOORE, DEVON TYLEN —
18872101 FERROMAGNETIC CAPACITOR FERGUSON, DION —

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18686624 COBALT-CHROMIUM ALLOY MEMBER, METHOD OF PRODUCING THE SAME, AND DEVICE USING THE SAME CARPENTER, JOSHUA S 17d overdue
18996410 CO2 SEPARATION SYSTEM MOORE, DEVON TYLEN —
18834091 CO2 ADSORBENT AND CO2 SEPARATION AND RECOVERY METHOD USING THE SAME DIETERLE, JENNIFER M —
18577332 ADHESIVE, WOUND DRESSING MATERIAL, ANTI-ADHESION MATERIAL, HEMOSTATIC MATERIAL, SEALANT, AND SPRAY KIT BARZACH, JEFFREY EUGENE —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3763 1
2847 1
1733 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18996410 CO2 SEPARATION SYSTEM MOORE, DEVON TYLEN 3763 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 17, 2025
18872101 FERROMAGNETIC CAPACITOR FERGUSON, DION 2847 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 05, 2024
18834091 CO2 ADSORBENT AND CO2 SEPARATION AND RECOVERY METHOD USING THE SAME DIETERLE, JENNIFER M — §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 29, 2024
18686624 COBALT-CHROMIUM ALLOY MEMBER, METHOD OF PRODUCING THE SAME, AND DEVICE USING THE SAME CARPENTER, JOSHUA S 1733 §103§112 Final Rejection 17d overdue Pending Feb 26, 2024
18577332 ADHESIVE, WOUND DRESSING MATERIAL, ANTI-ADHESION MATERIAL, HEMOSTATIC MATERIAL, SEALANT, AND SPRAY KIT BARZACH, JEFFREY EUGENE — §103§112DP Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 08, 2024

Managing National Institute for Materials Science's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month