Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Nayax Ltd.

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

3 pending office actions • 2 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Nayax Ltd. is currently prosecuting 2 pending office actions in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These 2 actions are split between 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units. BUNKER, WILLIAM B is the busiest examiner, currently overseeing 1 pending office action. With 2 pending office actions distributed across 2 distinct art units, Nayax Ltd.'s current patent efforts are divided between different technical specialties within the USPTO.

The 2 distinct examiners each bring their own approach to the 2 pending office actions, requiring the company to manage two separate prosecution tracks. BUNKER, WILLIAM B's role in handling 1 pending office action makes them a key figure for half of the company's active matters. The 2 pending office actions in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems area represent the entirety of the company's current pending workload. This focused activity allows for close monitoring of each individual examiner's feedback. Practitioners should address the specific requirements of the 2 distinct art units to ensure successful outcomes for the 2 pending office actions.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (33%)
§101 + other2 (67%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
BUNKER, WILLIAM B 1 80.2% +94.9%
POLLOCK, GREGORY A 1 11.1% +12.5%
MANDEL, MONICA A 1 18.1% +8.3%

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18862654 SYSTEM, DEVICE AND METHOD FOR VERIFYING PAYMENT VALIDITY POLLOCK, GREGORY A 8d
19247121 A SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MAKING PAYMENTS WITH SECURITIES BUNKER, WILLIAM B —
18293915 SYSTEM, DEVICE AND METHOD FOR DIGITAL PAYMENT MANDEL, MONICA A —

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18862654 SYSTEM, DEVICE AND METHOD FOR VERIFYING PAYMENT VALIDITY POLLOCK, GREGORY A 8d
19247121 A SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MAKING PAYMENTS WITH SECURITIES BUNKER, WILLIAM B —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3691 2
3622 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19247121 A SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MAKING PAYMENTS WITH SECURITIES BUNKER, WILLIAM B 3691 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 24, 2025
18862654 SYSTEM, DEVICE AND METHOD FOR VERIFYING PAYMENT VALIDITY POLLOCK, GREGORY A 3691 §101 Final Rejection 8d Pending Nov 04, 2024
18293915 SYSTEM, DEVICE AND METHOD FOR DIGITAL PAYMENT MANDEL, MONICA A 3622 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 31, 2024

Managing Nayax Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month