Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Nemein Limited is managing 1 pending office action within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The company's current prosecution is isolated to 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit, which limits the complexity of their current patent office interactions. This focused approach is used for portfolios that are targeting a very specific technical solution within the mechanical systems domain.
The busiest examiner, QUAIM, LAMIA, is handling 1 pending office action. This concentration means that the company's immediate success in securing patent rights depends on the specific examination of this one individual. Practitioners should tailor their responses to the 1 pending office action by analyzing the examiner's past decisions and the specific standards of the 1 distinct art unit involved.
With no other active matters, the 1 pending office action is the sole focus of the company's current USPTO strategy. The lack of multiple examiners or art units means that the applicant can provide a consistent and undiluted argument to advance their interests in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems sector. The 1 distinct examiner's role is central to the company's current patenting objectives.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| QUAIM, LAMIA | 1 | 74.0% | +17.8% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17633107 | SENSOR ARRANGEMENT | QUAIM, LAMIA | 13d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3676 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17633107 | SENSOR ARRANGEMENT | QUAIM, LAMIA | 3676 | §103 | Final Rejection | 13d | Pending | Feb 04, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial