Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Neuroone Medical Technologies Corporation

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

4 pending office actions • 1 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Neuroone Medical Technologies Corporation has 4 pending office actions in Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering. The record identifies 3 distinct examiners and 1 distinct art unit. BAYS, PAMELA M is the busiest examiner, with 2 pending matters.

The matters share one art-unit setting but are not distributed evenly among examiners. That combination may support consistent technical framing while making examiner-specific review important. Related device claims should be compared for terminology, disclosure support, and treatment of common prior art.

BAYS, PAMELA M handles 2 pending matters, creating a clear point for coordinated review. Counsel should examine those actions together for consistency, but preserve separate responses where claim language, cited references, or procedural posture differ. The remaining examiner assignments should not be assumed to follow the same approach.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
1
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (50%)
2
Medium (50%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (25%)
Double-patenting + other1 (25%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
4
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
BAYS, PAMELA M 2 71.8% +37.4%
SISON, CHRISTINE ANDREA PAN 1 32.7% +40.7%
MARLEN, TAMMIE K 1 75.3% +20.8%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18455258 SPINAL CORD STIMULATION DEVICE IMPLANTATION METHODS AND RELATED SYSTEMS AND DEVICES BAYS, PAMELA M 42d overdue
18497040 Agent-Delivering Neural Probe Devices And Related Systems And Methods SISON, CHRISTINE ANDREA PAN —

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18455258 SPINAL CORD STIMULATION DEVICE IMPLANTATION METHODS AND RELATED SYSTEMS AND DEVICES BAYS, PAMELA M 42d overdue
18358859 DEFORMABLE SPINAL CORD STIMULATION DEVICE AND RELATED SYSTEMS AND METHODS MARLEN, TAMMIE K 7d
18796426 SPINAL CORD STIMULATION DEVICE IMPLANTATION METHODS AND RELATED SYSTEMS AND DEVICES BAYS, PAMELA M —
18497040 Agent-Delivering Neural Probe Devices And Related Systems And Methods SISON, CHRISTINE ANDREA PAN —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3796 4

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18796426 SPINAL CORD STIMULATION DEVICE IMPLANTATION METHODS AND RELATED SYSTEMS AND DEVICES BAYS, PAMELA M 3796 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 07, 2024
18497040 Agent-Delivering Neural Probe Devices And Related Systems And Methods SISON, CHRISTINE ANDREA PAN 3796 §102§103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 30, 2023
18455258 SPINAL CORD STIMULATION DEVICE IMPLANTATION METHODS AND RELATED SYSTEMS AND DEVICES BAYS, PAMELA M 3796 §103§112Other Final Rejection 42d overdue Pending Aug 24, 2023
18358859 DEFORMABLE SPINAL CORD STIMULATION DEVICE AND RELATED SYSTEMS AND METHODS MARLEN, TAMMIE K 3796 §102§103DP Final Rejection 7d Pending Jul 25, 2023

Managing Neuroone Medical Technologies Corporation's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Neuroone Medical Technologies Corporation have?

Neuroone Medical Technologies Corporation has 4 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 3 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Neuroone Medical Technologies Corporation applications?

Pamela M Bays has the most, with 2 of Neuroone Medical Technologies Corporation's pending office actions.

What technology area are Neuroone Medical Technologies Corporation's patent applications in?

Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month