Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
3 pending office actions • 2 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 2 (67%) |
| §102 only | 1 (33%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| CHOUDHURY, MUSTAK | 1 | 84.4% | +22.5% |
| WILKES, ZACHARY W | 1 | 66.4% | +22.1% |
| DOUGHERTY, SEAN PATRICK | 1 | 75.1% | +14.6% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18621609 | TEST IMAGE SET FOR TESTING VISUAL CHARACTERISTICS, TEST METHOD FOR VISUAL CHARACTERISTICS, DETERMINING METHOD FOR DETERMINING CHARACTERISTICS OF CORRECTION FILTER, AND CORRECTION FILTER | CHOUDHURY, MUSTAK | 20d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17538564 | TISSUE REMOVAL DEVICE WITH ADJUSTABLE DELIVERY SLEEVE FOR NEUROSURGICAL AND SPINAL SURGERY APPLICATIONS | DOUGHERTY, SEAN PATRICK | 8d overdue |
| 18621609 | TEST IMAGE SET FOR TESTING VISUAL CHARACTERISTICS, TEST METHOD FOR VISUAL CHARACTERISTICS, DETERMINING METHOD FOR DETERMINING CHARACTERISTICS OF CORRECTION FILTER, AND CORRECTION FILTER | CHOUDHURY, MUSTAK | 20d |
| 17892988 | METHOD FOR TESTING VISUAL CHARACTERISTICS, METHOD FOR DETERMINING CHARACTERISTICS OF OPTICAL FILTER, OPTICAL FILTER, OPTICAL ELEMENT SET FOR TESTING VISUAL CHARACTERISTICS AND TEST IMAGE FOR TESTING VISUAL CHARACTERISTICS | WILKES, ZACHARY W | 54d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2872 | 2 |
| 3791 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18621609 | TEST IMAGE SET FOR TESTING VISUAL CHARACTERISTICS, TEST METHOD FOR VISUAL CHARACTERISTICS, DETERMINING METHOD FOR DETERMINING CHARACTERISTICS OF CORRECTION FILTER, AND CORRECTION FILTER | CHOUDHURY, MUSTAK | 2872 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 20d | Pending | Mar 29, 2024 |
| 17892988 | METHOD FOR TESTING VISUAL CHARACTERISTICS, METHOD FOR DETERMINING CHARACTERISTICS OF OPTICAL FILTER, OPTICAL FILTER, OPTICAL ELEMENT SET FOR TESTING VISUAL CHARACTERISTICS AND TEST IMAGE FOR TESTING VISUAL CHARACTERISTICS | WILKES, ZACHARY W | 2872 | §102 | Final Rejection | 54d | Pending | Aug 22, 2022 |
| 17538564 | TISSUE REMOVAL DEVICE WITH ADJUSTABLE DELIVERY SLEEVE FOR NEUROSURGICAL AND SPINAL SURGERY APPLICATIONS | DOUGHERTY, SEAN PATRICK | 3791 | §103 | Final Rejection | 8d overdue | Pending | Nov 30, 2021 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial