Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
5 pending office actions • 5 art units • 5 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 4 (80%) |
| §102 only | 1 (20%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| HENN, TIMOTHY J | 1 | 85.8% | +11.5% |
| JERABEK, KELLY L | 1 | 85.1% | +11.4% |
| GUGGER, SEAN A | 1 | 64.5% | +22.9% |
| FULLER, RODNEY EVAN | 1 | 83.9% | +8.6% |
| PHAM, QUAN L | 1 | 69.9% | +28.9% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18928185 | IMAGING UNIT | HENN, TIMOTHY J | 38d overdue |
| 18761312 | BLADE OPEN-CLOSE DEVICE | JERABEK, KELLY L | 25d overdue |
| 18642687 | BLADE OPEN-CLOSE DEVICE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE | FULLER, RODNEY EVAN | 19d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18928185 | IMAGING UNIT | HENN, TIMOTHY J | 38d overdue |
| 18761312 | BLADE OPEN-CLOSE DEVICE | JERABEK, KELLY L | 25d overdue |
| 18429430 | IMAGING DEVICE INCLUDING AN ILLUMINATOR AND A LIGHT SHIELD FOR PERTIALLY BLOCKING ILLUMINATION LIGHT | PHAM, QUAN L | 4d overdue |
| 18740515 | VIBRATION MODULE | GUGGER, SEAN A | 19d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2639 | 1 |
| 2699 | 1 |
| 2834 | 1 |
| 2852 | 1 |
| 2637 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18928185 | IMAGING UNIT | HENN, TIMOTHY J | 2639 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 38d overdue | Pending | Oct 28, 2024 |
| 18761312 | BLADE OPEN-CLOSE DEVICE | JERABEK, KELLY L | 2699 | §102 | Non-Final OA | 25d overdue | Pending | Jul 02, 2024 |
| 18740515 | VIBRATION MODULE | GUGGER, SEAN A | 2834 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 19d | Pending | Jun 12, 2024 |
| 18642687 | BLADE OPEN-CLOSE DEVICE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE | FULLER, RODNEY EVAN | 2852 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 19d | Pending | Apr 22, 2024 |
| 18429430 | IMAGING DEVICE INCLUDING AN ILLUMINATOR AND A LIGHT SHIELD FOR PERTIALLY BLOCKING ILLUMINATION LIGHT | PHAM, QUAN L | 2637 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 4d overdue | Pending | Feb 01, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial