Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Nisshin Seifun Welna Inc.

Technology area: Chemistry & Materials

2 pending office actions • 1 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Nisshin Seifun Welna Inc. maintains a company patent portfolio in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. There are currently 2 pending office actions for the company. These actions are being handled by 2 distinct examiners, meaning each examiner is responsible for one pending matter.

The portfolio is active within 1 distinct art unit. This suggests that while different examiners are involved, the technology remains within a single specialized group at the patent office. LACHICA, ERICSON M is the busiest examiner, with 1 busiest examiner pending office action.

For practitioners, having 2 pending office actions in 1 art unit but under 2 different examiners requires monitoring for consistency in examination. The focus on Chemistry & Materials is consistent across both pending matters. The workload is evenly split between the 2 distinct examiners. This arrangement provides the company with two separate perspectives from the same art unit, which can be beneficial for understanding the examination standards applied to their chemical innovations.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (50%)
1
Medium (50%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (50%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
50% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
1
Business / Other
50% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
LACHICA, ERICSON M 1 30.0% +35.4%
KOHLER, STEPHANIE A 1 31.9% +31.1%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18728975 GROOVED NOODLES LACHICA, ERICSON M —

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18728975 GROOVED NOODLES LACHICA, ERICSON M —
18554099 COATING COMPOSITION FOR FRIED FOOD KOHLER, STEPHANIE A —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1791 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18728975 GROOVED NOODLES LACHICA, ERICSON M — §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 15, 2024
18554099 COATING COMPOSITION FOR FRIED FOOD KOHLER, STEPHANIE A 1791 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 05, 2023

Managing Nisshin Seifun Welna Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month