Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

NITTA Corporation

Technology area: Chemistry & Materials

7 pending office actions • 5 art units • 7 examiners • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

NITTA Corporation currently has 7 pending office actions within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. These matters are distributed among 7 distinct examiners, which means that each examiner is handling exactly 1 matter. This distribution indicates that the company's prosecution is not concentrated with any single individual, requiring coordination across 7 different examiner perspectives within the Chemistry & Materials sector.

The portfolio is spread across 5 distinct art units, showing that the company's chemical innovations fall into several different technical categories. CARSON GROSS is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, currently overseeing 1 pending office action. Since there are 7 distinct examiners for 7 pending office actions, CARSON GROSS holds the same number of cases as every other examiner involved. The use of 5 distinct art units for these pending office actions suggests a high degree of technical variety in the company's current filings.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

7
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
5
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

3
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (3)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (14%)
5
Medium (71%)
1
Easy (14%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only5 (71%)
§112 only1 (14%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (14%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

6
Life Sciences
86% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
14% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

70 h
Manual time on pending OAs
14 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
24 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.6 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
GROSS, CARSON 1 73.1% +21.3%
MCNALLY, DANIEL 1 68.0% +13.6%
DUNLAP, JONATHAN M 1 76.2% +17.0%
MATZEK, MATTHEW D 1 46.3% +36.8%
JOYNER, KEVIN 1 68.3% +23.6%
LEE, AHAM NMN 1 46.3% +54.5%
HENSEL, BRENDAN A 1 66.1% +27.7%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19120325 ADHESIVE WITH PRESSURE REGULATION FUNCTION GROSS, CARSON —

Interview Candidates (7)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18029744 DECONTAMINATION APPARATUS AND DECONTAMINATION METHOD LEE, AHAM NMN 89d overdue
18254928 COMPOSITE MATERIAL, METHOD FOR PRODUCING SAME, AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING REINFORCING FIBER BASE MATERIAL MATZEK, MATTHEW D 70d overdue
17600333 DECONTAMINATION DEVICE AND SYSTEM HENSEL, BRENDAN A 23d overdue
19120325 ADHESIVE WITH PRESSURE REGULATION FUNCTION GROSS, CARSON —
18879855 WINDOW MATERIAL AND LIGHT-TRANSPARENT ROOF MATERIAL MCNALLY, DANIEL —
18281984 PRESSURE SENSOR DUNLAP, JONATHAN M —
18029790 DECONTAMINATION METHOD JOYNER, KEVIN —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1746 2
1758 2
2855 1
1786 1
1799 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19120325 ADHESIVE WITH PRESSURE REGULATION FUNCTION GROSS, CARSON 1746 §102§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 11, 2025
18879855 WINDOW MATERIAL AND LIGHT-TRANSPARENT ROOF MATERIAL MCNALLY, DANIEL 1746 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 30, 2024
18281984 PRESSURE SENSOR DUNLAP, JONATHAN M 2855 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Sep 14, 2023
18254928 COMPOSITE MATERIAL, METHOD FOR PRODUCING SAME, AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING REINFORCING FIBER BASE MATERIAL MATZEK, MATTHEW D 1786 §103 Final Rejection 70d overdue Pending Jul 06, 2023
18029790 DECONTAMINATION METHOD JOYNER, KEVIN 1799 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Mar 31, 2023
18029744 DECONTAMINATION APPARATUS AND DECONTAMINATION METHOD LEE, AHAM NMN 1758 §103 Final Rejection 89d overdue Pending Mar 31, 2023
17600333 DECONTAMINATION DEVICE AND SYSTEM HENSEL, BRENDAN A 1758 §103 Final Rejection 23d overdue Pending Sep 30, 2021

Managing NITTA Corporation's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month