Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Nosmek Green Solutions Inc. operates in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area and currently has 1 pending office action. This matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, showing a focused prosecution path for the company's current filings. The activity is situated within 1 distinct art unit, which points to a specialized technical focus for the pending application within the broader engineering sector.
The busiest examiner for the portfolio is EDWARDS, LOREN C, who is responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending action. As this is the only pending action, the examiner's specific approach to the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering field is the primary factor in the company's prosecution. Practitioners should tailor their strategy to the individual tendencies of EDWARDS, LOREN C, as there are no other active matters to offset this examiner's influence.
The presence of 1 pending office action in 1 distinct art unit under 1 distinct examiner indicates a very specific and localized engagement with the patent office. This concentration means that the company's immediate success in securing patent rights is tied to a single official's review. Navigating the requirements of the 1 busiest examiner pending action is the central task for the company's current intellectual property strategy.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| EDWARDS, LOREN C | 1 | 81.5% | +29.2% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18933400 | ELECTRICAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEM | EDWARDS, LOREN C | 29d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18933400 | ELECTRICAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEM | EDWARDS, LOREN C | 29d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3746 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18933400 | ELECTRICAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEM | EDWARDS, LOREN C | 3746 | §102§103 | Final Rejection | 29d | Pending | Oct 31, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial