Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
2 pending office actions • 1 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Ntplast S R L has 2 pending office actions in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These actions involve 2 distinct examiners but are both situated within 1 distinct art unit. This structure shows that while different individuals are reviewing the applications, the subject matter remains within a single technical group.
The busiest examiner is LAWSON, MATTHEW JAMES, who is currently managing 1 pending office action. This represents a share of the total 2 pending actions for the portfolio. The presence of 2 examiners indicates a lack of examiner overlap for the current pending matters.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 2 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| LAWSON, MATTHEW JAMES | 1 | 73.7% | +29.9% |
| WEISBERG, AMY REGINA | 1 | 52.5% | +25.7% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19470048 | DEVICE FOR FIXING A CRANIAL FLAP TO THE CRANIAL VAULT TO BE POSITIONED IN THE CRANIOTOMY HOLE | LAWSON, MATTHEW JAMES | — |
| 18842176 | CRANIAL FIXATION DEVICE FOR DECOMPRESSIVE / AUGMENTATIVE CRANIECTOMY | WEISBERG, AMY REGINA | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19470048 | DEVICE FOR FIXING A CRANIAL FLAP TO THE CRANIAL VAULT TO BE POSITIONED IN THE CRANIOTOMY HOLE | LAWSON, MATTHEW JAMES | — |
| 18842176 | CRANIAL FIXATION DEVICE FOR DECOMPRESSIVE / AUGMENTATIVE CRANIECTOMY | WEISBERG, AMY REGINA | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3619 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19470048 | DEVICE FOR FIXING A CRANIAL FLAP TO THE CRANIAL VAULT TO BE POSITIONED IN THE CRANIOTOMY HOLE | LAWSON, MATTHEW JAMES | 3619 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Sep 28, 2025 |
| 18842176 | CRANIAL FIXATION DEVICE FOR DECOMPRESSIVE / AUGMENTATIVE CRANIECTOMY | WEISBERG, AMY REGINA | — | §102§103§112Other | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Aug 28, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial