Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
3 pending office actions • 2 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Nutromics Technology Pty Ltd. operates in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. The company has 3 pending office actions. These actions are distributed across 2 distinct art units, indicating a focus on specific chemical or material science categories. Having 3 pending office actions within 2 distinct art units suggests a relatively narrow but active technical focus for the company's current patent filings in the Chemistry & Materials sector.
The prosecution involves 3 distinct examiners. Shizhi Qian is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, with 1 pending office action. With 3 distinct examiners for 3 pending office actions, each matter is being reviewed by a different individual across the 2 distinct art units. This arrangement ensures that each of the 3 pending office actions is receiving independent review from a separate examiner, with Shizhi Qian being one of the three officials currently assigned to evaluate the company's technology.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (33%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 2 (67%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| QIAN, SHIZHI | 1 | 61.8% | +47.9% |
| SHOULDERS, ANNIE LEE | 1 | 74.6% | +17.6% |
| KOO, BENJAMIN K | 1 | 57.1% | +49.7% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19118983 | METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR DETERMINING THE AMOUNT OF AN ANALYTE IN A FLUID USING A PERIODIC WAVEFORM | QIAN, SHIZHI | — |
| 18878381 | MULTIPLEXING SENSOR APPARATUS AND METHODS OF PRODUCTION THEREOF | SHOULDERS, ANNIE LEE | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18214111 | EXTENDED WEAR MICRONEEDLE APPARATUS | KOO, BENJAMIN K | 20d |
| 19118983 | METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR DETERMINING THE AMOUNT OF AN ANALYTE IN A FLUID USING A PERIODIC WAVEFORM | QIAN, SHIZHI | — |
| 18878381 | MULTIPLEXING SENSOR APPARATUS AND METHODS OF PRODUCTION THEREOF | SHOULDERS, ANNIE LEE | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1795 | 1 |
| 3783 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19118983 | METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR DETERMINING THE AMOUNT OF AN ANALYTE IN A FLUID USING A PERIODIC WAVEFORM | QIAN, SHIZHI | 1795 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Apr 07, 2025 |
| 18878381 | MULTIPLEXING SENSOR APPARATUS AND METHODS OF PRODUCTION THEREOF | SHOULDERS, ANNIE LEE | — | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 23, 2024 |
| 18214111 | EXTENDED WEAR MICRONEEDLE APPARATUS | KOO, BENJAMIN K | 3783 | §103 | Final Rejection | 20d | Pending | Jun 26, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial