Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
2 pending office actions • 0 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Nxu Technologies LLC has 2 pending office actions distributed across its patent portfolio. These actions are handled by 2 distinct examiners, showing that each pending matter is being reviewed by a different individual at the patent office. This distribution provides the company with multiple examiner perspectives on its current applications.
FUREMAN, JARED is identified as the busiest examiner for the entity, with 1 pending office action under review. This represents a portion of the total 2 pending office actions currently facing the company. The involvement of different examiners means that the company must manage various examination styles simultaneously to advance its intellectual property.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (50%) |
| §102 only | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| FUREMAN, JARED | 1 | 42.1% | +20.7% |
| TSO, EDWARD H | 1 | 87.0% | +6.6% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18378696 | Systems and Methods for Balancing Battery Packs | TSO, EDWARD H | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18530701 | Systems and Methods for Charging the Battery of an Electric Vehicle | FUREMAN, JARED | — |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18530701 | Systems and Methods for Charging the Battery of an Electric Vehicle | FUREMAN, JARED | — | §102 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 06, 2023 |
| 18378696 | Systems and Methods for Balancing Battery Packs | TSO, EDWARD H | — | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Oct 11, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial