Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Ohayo Dairy Products Co. Ltd. has 1 pending office action in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. The portfolio is currently managed by 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit, representing a consolidated prosecution environment. This singular focus within 1 distinct art unit suggests that the company's active patent applications are closely related in their technical subject matter. Managing 1 pending office action provides an opportunity for the company to dedicate its resources to a single matter without the distraction of other active cases.
MCCLAIN, TYNESHA L. is identified as the busiest examiner with 1 busiest examiner pending office action. This examiner oversees the entirety of the portfolio's 1 pending office action, meaning the company's current interactions with the office are handled by a single point of contact. Because the busiest examiner pending count is equal to the total number of pending office actions, the role of MCCLAIN, TYNESHA L. is paramount. Practitioners should prioritize understanding the specific requirements of this examiner, as there are no other distinct examiners or art units currently active in the company's prosecution pipeline.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCCLAIN, TYNESHA L. | 1 | 15.8% | +24.2% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17886760 | FOOD ITEM AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SAME | MCCLAIN, TYNESHA L. | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17886760 | FOOD ITEM AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SAME | MCCLAIN, TYNESHA L. | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1793 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17886760 | FOOD ITEM AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SAME | MCCLAIN, TYNESHA L. | 1793 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Aug 12, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial