Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 15, 2026

Okogen Inc.

4 pending office actions • 3 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (25%)
3
Medium (75%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (25%)
§103 only2 (50%)
Double-patenting + other1 (25%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

4
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
SWIFT, CANDICE LEE 1 57.4% +36.7%
FAN, LYNN Y 1 47.6% +48.7%
SIFFORD, JEFFREY MARK 1 55.7% +32.1%
CONSTANTINE, CHARLES Z 1 59.0% +48.8%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17906631 RIBONUCLEASES FOR TREATING VIRAL INFECTIONS SIFFORD, JEFFREY MARK

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
16368330 METHODS AND PHARMACEUTICALS FOR TREATMENT OF VIRAL INFECTIONS OF THE EYE CONSTANTINE, CHARLES Z 28d
18547164 PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS COMPRISING RANPIRNASE SWIFT, CANDICE LEE
17996577 TREATMENT OF VIRAL CONJUNCTIVITIS FAN, LYNN Y
17906631 RIBONUCLEASES FOR TREATING VIRAL INFECTIONS SIFFORD, JEFFREY MARK

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1657 2
1759 1
1671 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18547164 PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS COMPRISING RANPIRNASE SWIFT, CANDICE LEE 1657 §102§103§112DPOther Non-Final OA Pending Aug 21, 2023
17996577 TREATMENT OF VIRAL CONJUNCTIVITIS FAN, LYNN Y 1759 §103 Final Rejection Pending Oct 19, 2022
17906631 RIBONUCLEASES FOR TREATING VIRAL INFECTIONS SIFFORD, JEFFREY MARK 1671 §101§103§112Other Non-Final OA Pending Sep 19, 2022
16368330 METHODS AND PHARMACEUTICALS FOR TREATMENT OF VIRAL INFECTIONS OF THE EYE CONSTANTINE, CHARLES Z 1657 §103 Final Rejection 28d Pending Mar 28, 2019

Managing Okogen Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month