Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Olden Labs Pbc

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

2 pending office actions • 1 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Olden Labs Pbc is currently managing 2 pending office actions in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These actions are assigned to 2 distinct examiners, with each examiner reviewing one case. The prosecution is centralized within 1 distinct art unit, indicating that the company's current patent applications are technically related and subject to the same departmental standards.

The busiest examiner, KENIRY, HEATHER J, is responsible for 1 pending case. This distribution, where 2 distinct examiners handle 2 pending office actions, means that the practitioner must manage two separate relationships at the USPTO. However, because both cases are in 1 distinct art unit, the practitioner can likely use a consistent set of technical definitions and prior art interpretations across both matters within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems area.

Having 2 pending office actions suggests a focused and manageable portfolio. The practitioner's strategy should focus on the individual preferences of the 2 distinct examiners while leveraging the shared context of the 1 distinct art unit. Since the busiest examiner, KENIRY, HEATHER J, only handles 1 pending case, there is no opportunity to resolve both outstanding actions through a single point of contact, requiring a dual-track prosecution approach for the 2 pending office actions.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
50% of docket
1
Business / Other
50% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
KENIRY, HEATHER J 1 81.0% +19.5%
ALEKSIC, NEVENA 1 75.0% +9.4%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18318444 SMART CAGE SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR HOUSING AND ASSAYING MULTIPLE VERTEBRATE ANIMALS ALEKSIC, NEVENA 27d
19195131 AUTOMATED ROBOTIC ARM ASSEMBLY AND SMART CAGE ASSEMBLY SYSTEM FOR VERTEBRATE ANIMAL CARE KENIRY, HEATHER J —

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19195131 AUTOMATED ROBOTIC ARM ASSEMBLY AND SMART CAGE ASSEMBLY SYSTEM FOR VERTEBRATE ANIMAL CARE KENIRY, HEATHER J —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3647 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19195131 AUTOMATED ROBOTIC ARM ASSEMBLY AND SMART CAGE ASSEMBLY SYSTEM FOR VERTEBRATE ANIMAL CARE KENIRY, HEATHER J — §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 30, 2025
18318444 SMART CAGE SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR HOUSING AND ASSAYING MULTIPLE VERTEBRATE ANIMALS ALEKSIC, NEVENA 3647 §103§112 Non-Final OA 27d Pending May 16, 2023

Managing Olden Labs Pbc's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month