Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
2 pending office actions • 1 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Onejoon GmbH has 2 pending office actions within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. These actions are distributed between 2 distinct examiners, with each examiner responsible for one pending case. KEITH CAMPBELL is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, holding 1 pending office action. Both pending actions are situated within 1 distinct art unit, suggesting a unified technical focus despite the involvement of multiple examiners.
The concentration of work in a single art unit may allow for a more consistent application of technical standards, even though 2 different examiners are involved. With 2 pending office actions and 2 examiners, the company faces a distributed workload where each examiner has an equal share of the current pending matters. This profile indicates a specialized but small-scale prosecution effort in the chemistry sector.
Practitioners can leverage the shared 1 art unit to ensure technical consistency across the 2 pending office actions. While 2 distinct examiners are involved, including KEITH CAMPBELL, the common art unit provides a stable technical environment. This structure requires managing 2 separate examiner relationships while adhering to a single set of art unit guidelines for both of the 2 pending matters.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (50%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| CAMPBELL, KEITH | 1 | 89.7% | +0.9% |
| CORALLO, CATRIONA MARY | 1 | 67.0% | +12.9% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18994788 | CONVEYING DEVICE FOR CONVEYING MATERIAL | CAMPBELL, KEITH | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17764310 | PROCESS FOR PRODUCING GRAPHITE AND VERTICAL GRAPHITIZATION FURNACE | CORALLO, CATRIONA MARY | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1732 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18994788 | CONVEYING DEVICE FOR CONVEYING MATERIAL | CAMPBELL, KEITH | — | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jan 15, 2025 |
| 17764310 | PROCESS FOR PRODUCING GRAPHITE AND VERTICAL GRAPHITIZATION FURNACE | CORALLO, CATRIONA MARY | 1732 | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Mar 28, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial