Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology areas: Networking & Security • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
3 pending office actions • 2 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Onesky Flight LLC has 3 pending office actions in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These actions are distributed across 2 distinct art units and 3 distinct examiners. This means that every pending action is being handled by a different individual, providing no overlap in examiner experience for this portfolio. The involvement of distinct examiners for only the actions indicates a highly fragmented examination process for the company.
The busiest examiner, ELCHANTI, ZEINA, is responsible for 1 pending office action. Since there are distinct examiners for the total actions, the workload is perfectly distributed among the assigned staff. The presence of 2 distinct art units suggests that the pending actions cover at least different technical or administrative categories within the USPTO's transportation and e-commerce divisions. Practitioners must be prepared to handle different procedural expectations across these 2 distinct art units.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (33%) |
| Double-patenting only | 1 (33%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (33%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ELCHANTI, ZEINA | 1 | 64.3% | +25.0% |
| HUANG, KAYLEE J | 1 | 74.6% | +49.2% |
| WILLIAMS, JEFFERY L | 1 | 68.8% | +19.0% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19045159 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF ELECTRONIC NOTIFICATIONS | HUANG, KAYLEE J | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19346153 | FLEET OPTIMIZER | ELCHANTI, ZEINA | — |
| 19045159 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF ELECTRONIC NOTIFICATIONS | HUANG, KAYLEE J | — |
| 18582870 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DATA ACCESS GENERATION | WILLIAMS, JEFFERY L | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3628 | 1 |
| 2495 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19346153 | FLEET OPTIMIZER | ELCHANTI, ZEINA | 3628 | DP | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Sep 30, 2025 |
| 19045159 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF ELECTRONIC NOTIFICATIONS | HUANG, KAYLEE J | — | §103§112Other | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Feb 04, 2025 |
| 18582870 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DATA ACCESS GENERATION | WILLIAMS, JEFFERY L | 2495 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Feb 21, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial