Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Computing & Software
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Onio AS maintains a patent portfolio in the Computing & Software technology area. Currently, the company has 1 pending office action. This pending matter is located in 1 distinct art unit, indicating a specific focus within these software technical categories. This concentration indicates a strategic emphasis on a particular technical niche within the Computing & Software sector.
The examination process is overseen by 1 distinct examiner. JUNG, ANDREW J is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, handling 1 pending office action. The data shows that there is no distribution of the workload across multiple examiners at this time. The use of 1 distinct examiner suggests a centralized review process where all communication is directed through this official, which simplifies the management of the portfolio.
With 1 pending office action and 1 distinct examiner, the prosecution environment is very narrow. Practitioners can see that the 1 distinct art unit involved is the only area of active prosecution for Onio AS. Since JUNG, ANDREW J handles 1 pending office action, the outcome depends on this individual's interpretation of the claims.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| JUNG, ANDREW J | 1 | 57.8% | +40.0% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17752860 | COMPUTER SYSTEM USING ENERGY BARRIER INSTRUCTIONS | JUNG, ANDREW J | 41d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2175 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17752860 | COMPUTER SYSTEM USING ENERGY BARRIER INSTRUCTIONS | JUNG, ANDREW J | 2175 | §103 | Final Rejection | 41d | Pending | May 25, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial