Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Opna Bio SA operates a patent portfolio within the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. At present, the portfolio includes 1 pending office action. This action is being processed within 1 distinct art unit, reflecting a focused examination path for the company's current intellectual property assets. Concentration within a single art unit often indicates that the company's current research and development efforts are clustered around a specific technological innovation.
The prosecution is handled by 1 distinct examiner, specifically ROBINSON, MIKHAIL O'DONNEL. As the busiest examiner, ROBINSON, MIKHAIL O'DONNEL is responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending action. This individual manages the entirety of the company's pending matters, providing a singular point of contact for current prosecution efforts. For the applicant, the prosecution strategy must be tailored to the specific tendencies of this examiner, as there are no other active matters to balance the portfolio's progress.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROBINSON, MIKHAIL O'DONNEL | 1 | 59.2% | +42.1% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18505538 | COMPOUNDS AND METHODS FOR YAP/TEAD MODULATION AND INDICATIONS THEREFOR | ROBINSON, MIKHAIL O'DONNEL | 5d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18505538 | COMPOUNDS AND METHODS FOR YAP/TEAD MODULATION AND INDICATIONS THEREFOR | ROBINSON, MIKHAIL O'DONNEL | 5d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1627 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18505538 | COMPOUNDS AND METHODS FOR YAP/TEAD MODULATION AND INDICATIONS THEREFOR | ROBINSON, MIKHAIL O'DONNEL | 1627 | §103§112Other | Final Rejection | 5d | Pending | Nov 09, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial