Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Optofidelity OY has 1 pending office action within the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area. This single action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner in 1 distinct art unit. The current prosecution activity is highly focused, with all pending matters residing with a single individual in one specific division of the patent office. This centralized environment simplifies the management of the company's immediate patent goals.
AKANBI, ISIAKA O is the busiest examiner for the company, currently overseeing 1 pending office action. Because there is only 1 pending office action under review, the company's immediate patent outcomes in this technology area depend entirely on this individual review process. The presence of 1 distinct art unit means that the prosecution strategy does not need to account for varying departmental standards. Practitioners can focus their efforts on the specific requirements of AKANBI, ISIAKA O to resolve the active matter. This focused approach allows for a direct response to the technical issues raised.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §102 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| AKANBI, ISIAKA O | 1 | 76.6% | +22.9% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19142844 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR TESTING AN OPTICAL ELEMENT | AKANBI, ISIAKA O | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2877 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19142844 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR TESTING AN OPTICAL ELEMENT | AKANBI, ISIAKA O | 2877 | §102 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jun 24, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialOptofidelity OY has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Isiaka O Akanbi has the most, with 1 of Optofidelity OY's pending office actions.
Mostly Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics (USPTO Tech Center 2800), based on where its pending office actions are examined.