Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Optoquest Co. Ltd. is currently navigating the patent prosecution process in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The company has 1 pending office action, which is being handled within 1 distinct art unit. This suggests a very specific technical focus for the company's current filings, with no other active matters currently distributed across different art units. The 1 distinct art units involved provide a concentrated technical environment for the examination of the company's current innovations.
The prosecution is overseen by 1 distinct examiners, with FLORES, MARK ANTHONY serving as the busiest examiner. FLORES, MARK ANTHONY is responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending office action, representing the entirety of the portfolio's active workload. This singular point of contact at the USPTO allows for a focused and direct interaction between the applicant and the examiner. With only 1 pending office action and 1 distinct examiners, the portfolio's immediate progress is tied to a single examination cycle.
Practitioners can concentrate their efforts on the specific requirements and examination style of FLORES, MARK ANTHONY within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems field. This lack of complexity across 1 distinct art units simplifies the management of the company's current intellectual property assets. The 1 busiest examiner pending status ensures that all current feedback originates from a single source, allowing for a unified response strategy. This concentration in a single technology area highlights the company's core technical focus during this prosecution cycle.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| FLORES, MARK ANTHONY | 1 | — | — |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18573138 | OPTICAL FIBER OUTPUT LIGHT SOURCE DEVICE, AND SINGLE-POLARIZATION REFLECTIVE POLARIZING BEAM SPLITTER USED THEREIN | FLORES, MARK ANTHONY | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3648 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18573138 | OPTICAL FIBER OUTPUT LIGHT SOURCE DEVICE, AND SINGLE-POLARIZATION REFLECTIVE POLARIZING BEAM SPLITTER USED THEREIN | FLORES, MARK ANTHONY | 3648 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jul 23, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialOptoquest Co. Ltd. has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Mark Anthony Flores has the most, with 1 of Optoquest Co. Ltd.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.