Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Oragenics Inc.

Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

3 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Oragenics Inc. is currently managing 3 pending office actions within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. These actions are distributed between 2 distinct examiners, which introduces variety in the examination styles the company must address. The prosecution activity is also spread across 2 distinct art units, indicating that the company's technology is being reviewed by two separate technical groups at the USPTO.

BAKSHI, PANCHAM is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, currently overseeing 2 pending office actions. This means that BAKSHI, PANCHAM is responsible for 2 of the 3 pending actions, while one other examiner handles the remaining matter. This concentration of work with a single examiner allows the company to develop a consistent relationship and understanding of that official's specific requirements.

The presence of 3 pending office actions across 2 examiners and 2 art units suggests a focused but active prosecution strategy in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering sector. Practitioners should prioritize the interactions with BAKSHI, PANCHAM, given his significant role in the current docket. At the same time, they must ensure that the strategy for the third pending action remains aligned with the company's overall goals across both art units.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (67%)
1
Medium (33%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other2 (67%)
§103 only1 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
33% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
33% of docket
1
Business / Other
33% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
BAKSHI, PANCHAM 2 76.8% +30.2%
HALL, DEANNA K 1 75.7% +15.7%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18702776 BREATH-POWERED NASAL DEVICES FOR TREATMENT OF TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY (TBI), INCLUDING CONCUSSION, AND METHODS HALL, DEANNA K 215d overdue
18653138 C-20 STEROID COMPOUNDS, COMPOSITIONS AND USES THEREOF TO TREAT TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY (TBI), INCLUDING CONCUSSIONS BAKSHI, PANCHAM —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18702776 BREATH-POWERED NASAL DEVICES FOR TREATMENT OF TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY (TBI), INCLUDING CONCUSSION, AND METHODS HALL, DEANNA K 215d overdue
18653138 C-20 STEROID COMPOUNDS, COMPOSITIONS AND USES THEREOF TO TREAT TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY (TBI), INCLUDING CONCUSSIONS BAKSHI, PANCHAM —
14857331 C-20 STEROID COMPOUNDS, COMPOSITIONS AND USES THEREOF TO TREAT TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY (TBI), INCLUDING CONCUSSIONS BAKSHI, PANCHAM —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3783 1
1623 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18653138 C-20 STEROID COMPOUNDS, COMPOSITIONS AND USES THEREOF TO TREAT TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY (TBI), INCLUDING CONCUSSIONS BAKSHI, PANCHAM — §101§102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending May 02, 2024
18702776 BREATH-POWERED NASAL DEVICES FOR TREATMENT OF TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY (TBI), INCLUDING CONCUSSION, AND METHODS HALL, DEANNA K 3783 §101§102§103 Non-Final OA 215d overdue Pending Apr 18, 2024
14857331 C-20 STEROID COMPOUNDS, COMPOSITIONS AND USES THEREOF TO TREAT TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY (TBI), INCLUDING CONCUSSIONS BAKSHI, PANCHAM 1623 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 17, 2015

Managing Oragenics Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month