Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
4 pending office actions • 3 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 9 patents granted in the last 365 days
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 2 (50%) |
| §103 only | 2 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| MAI, HAO D | 1 | 48.9% | +39.1% |
| WEBB LYTTLE, ADRIENA JONIQUE | 1 | 25.0% | +100.0% |
| SMITH, EMILIE ALINE | 1 | 50.0% | +34.4% |
| CLOW, LORI A | 1 | 63.9% | +28.7% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17623818 | MULTIPLE BONE DENSITY DISPLAYING METHOD FOR ESTABLISHING IMPLANT PROCEDURE PLAN, AND IMAGE PROCESSING DEVICE THEREFOR | CLOW, LORI A | 49d overdue |
| 17924245 | TRANSPARENT BRACES DESIGN METHOD FOR CREATING TREATMENT PLAN, AND APPARATUS THEREFOR | WEBB LYTTLE, ADRIENA JONIQUE | 21d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17623818 | MULTIPLE BONE DENSITY DISPLAYING METHOD FOR ESTABLISHING IMPLANT PROCEDURE PLAN, AND IMAGE PROCESSING DEVICE THEREFOR | CLOW, LORI A | 49d overdue |
| 17917428 | MAXILLARY SINUS LIFTING SIMULATION METHOD AND APPARATUS THEREFOR | SMITH, EMILIE ALINE | 12d |
| 17924245 | TRANSPARENT BRACES DESIGN METHOD FOR CREATING TREATMENT PLAN, AND APPARATUS THEREFOR | WEBB LYTTLE, ADRIENA JONIQUE | 21d |
| 19100344 | CLEAR ALIGNER | MAI, HAO D | 34d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3772 | 2 |
| 1686 | 1 |
| 1687 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19100344 | CLEAR ALIGNER | MAI, HAO D | 3772 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 34d | Pending | Jan 31, 2025 |
| 17924245 | TRANSPARENT BRACES DESIGN METHOD FOR CREATING TREATMENT PLAN, AND APPARATUS THEREFOR | WEBB LYTTLE, ADRIENA JONIQUE | 3772 | §101 | Final Rejection | 21d | Pending | Nov 09, 2022 |
| 17917428 | MAXILLARY SINUS LIFTING SIMULATION METHOD AND APPARATUS THEREFOR | SMITH, EMILIE ALINE | 1686 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 12d | Pending | Oct 06, 2022 |
| 17623818 | MULTIPLE BONE DENSITY DISPLAYING METHOD FOR ESTABLISHING IMPLANT PROCEDURE PLAN, AND IMAGE PROCESSING DEVICE THEREFOR | CLOW, LORI A | 1687 | §101 | Non-Final OA | 49d overdue | Pending | Dec 29, 2021 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial