Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Othersphere Systems Inc. focuses its patent portfolio on the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The portfolio currently contains 1 pending office action, which is being reviewed by 1 distinct examiner. This activity is confined to 1 distinct art unit, suggesting a specialized technical focus for the company's current patent applications.
The busiest examiner, VIG, NARESH, is responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending action. This matches the total of 1 pending office action for the entire portfolio, making this examiner the primary figure in the company's current prosecution efforts. The alignment of a specific examiner with the active docket indicates a streamlined path through the patent office.
The data shows that 1 distinct art unit is involved in the current docket, which simplifies the technical scope of the prosecution. Practitioners can focus exclusively on the 1 busiest examiner pending action handled by VIG, NARESH. This action constitutes the full extent of the company's current active challenges within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems sector.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| VIG, NARESH | 1 | 36.4% | +42.9% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18658186 | DETERMINING INFRASTRUCTURE LOCATIONS USING GEOGRAPHIC TILING | VIG, NARESH | 31d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18658186 | DETERMINING INFRASTRUCTURE LOCATIONS USING GEOGRAPHIC TILING | VIG, NARESH | 31d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3622 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18658186 | DETERMINING INFRASTRUCTURE LOCATIONS USING GEOGRAPHIC TILING | VIG, NARESH | 3622 | §101 | Non-Final OA | 31d overdue | Pending | May 08, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial