Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026

Otonexus Medical Technologies Inc.

5 pending office actions • 3 art units • 5 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
2
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (40%)
3
Medium (60%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only3 (60%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (40%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
20% of docket
4
Mechanical / Eng
80% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
IP, JASON M 1 54.9% +25.1%
TAYLOR, APRIL ALICIA 1 78.7% +8.6%
YOON, CHANEL J 1 52.9% +39.2%
MELHUS, BENJAMIN S 1 60.0% +44.2%
DOUGHERTY, SEAN PATRICK 1 74.9% +15.1%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17880013 ACOUSTIC OTOSCOPE DOUGHERTY, SEAN PATRICK 56d
18476263 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR OPTICAL ILLUMINATION IN A SPECULUM TIP TAYLOR, APRIL ALICIA

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18935201 METHODS AND DEVICES FOR MEMBRANE CHARACTERIZATION WITH ULTRASOUND AND OPTICAL ILLUMINATION IP, JASON M 46d
17880013 ACOUSTIC OTOSCOPE DOUGHERTY, SEAN PATRICK 56d
18358762 METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR AUTOMATED PNEUMATIC OTOSCOPY YOON, CHANEL J
18065103 OTOSCOPE SEAL DEVICES AND METHODS MELHUS, BENJAMIN S

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3791 3
3797 1
2876 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18935201 METHODS AND DEVICES FOR MEMBRANE CHARACTERIZATION WITH ULTRASOUND AND OPTICAL ILLUMINATION IP, JASON M 3797 §103 Final Rejection 46d Pending Nov 01, 2024
18476263 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR OPTICAL ILLUMINATION IN A SPECULUM TIP TAYLOR, APRIL ALICIA 2876 §102§103 Non-Final OA Pending Sep 27, 2023
18358762 METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR AUTOMATED PNEUMATIC OTOSCOPY YOON, CHANEL J 3791 §103 Non-Final OA Pending Jul 25, 2023
18065103 OTOSCOPE SEAL DEVICES AND METHODS MELHUS, BENJAMIN S 3791 §103 Final Rejection Pending Dec 13, 2022
17880013 ACOUSTIC OTOSCOPE DOUGHERTY, SEAN PATRICK 3791 §102§103 Final Rejection 56d Pending Aug 03, 2022

Managing Otonexus Medical Technologies Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month