Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Ourad Safety Co. Ltd. currently manages 1 pending office action within the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area. This 1 action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner working within 1 distinct art unit. The concentrated nature of this portfolio suggests a highly specific focus for the company's current patent activities. Because there is only 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit involved, the prosecution strategy is centralized. This allows for a singular focus on the preferences of this specific examiner within the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics sector.
HUSTOFT, JUSTIN WAYNE is the busiest examiner for this portfolio, handling 1 pending office action. This 1 pending action represents the entirety of the company's current workload at the office. Practitioners can focus their strategy on this individual examiner's specific tendencies and requirements. The lack of diversity in art units or examiners means that the outcome of this 1 action will significantly impact the current state of the portfolio. This centralized approach simplifies the management of the company's intellectual property but increases the importance of each interaction with the assigned examiner.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| HUSTOFT, JUSTIN WAYNE | 1 | 67.0% | +21.9% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18451249 | LIGHTWEIGHT INDUSTRIAL EYEGLASS STRUCTURE | HUSTOFT, JUSTIN WAYNE | 26d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18451249 | LIGHTWEIGHT INDUSTRIAL EYEGLASS STRUCTURE | HUSTOFT, JUSTIN WAYNE | 26d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2872 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18451249 | LIGHTWEIGHT INDUSTRIAL EYEGLASS STRUCTURE | HUSTOFT, JUSTIN WAYNE | 2872 | §102§103 | Final Rejection | 26d overdue | Pending | Aug 17, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial