Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology areas: Computing & Software • Networking & Security
7 pending office actions • 5 art units • 7 examiners • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 5 patents granted in the last 365 days
Oxylabs Uab manages 7 pending office actions in the Networking & Security technology area. These 7 actions are assigned to 7 distinct examiners, meaning each examiner is handling exactly one case. The portfolio is distributed across 5 distinct art units, showing a high degree of technical variety for a small number of actions. This variety suggests that the 7 pending office actions cover diverse aspects of networking technology.
The busiest examiner is SERRAO, RANODHI N, with 1 pending office action. With 7 distinct examiners for 7 pending office actions, the company experiences a diverse range of examiner perspectives. The 5 distinct art units suggest that the 7 pending office actions involve several different technical niches. This decentralized prosecution strategy across 7 distinct examiners and 5 distinct art units minimizes the impact of any single examiner's decision on the overall portfolio of 7 pending office actions. For a practitioner, this distribution indicates that the company's Networking & Security innovations are being evaluated by multiple specialized units within the patent office.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 1 (14%) |
| §101 + other | 2 (29%) |
| §103 only | 2 (29%) |
| §102 only | 2 (29%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| SERRAO, RANODHI N | 1 | 87.2% | +15.4% |
| LEE, GIL H | 1 | 83.1% | +28.7% |
| NGUYEN, LOAN T | 1 | 64.6% | +23.7% |
| MOSER, BRUCE M | 1 | 84.2% | +20.1% |
| BARKER, TODD L | 1 | 75.7% | +23.1% |
| ALLEN, NICHOLAS E | 1 | 75.6% | +14.6% |
| OSMAN, RAMY M | 1 | 78.9% | -9.1% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19193451 | SELECTING MANAGED PROXY IP DEVICES BY GEOGRAPHICAL COORDINATES THEREOF | SERRAO, RANODHI N | — |
| 19098268 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS TO MAINTAIN MULTIPLE PERSISTENT CHANNELS BETWEEN PROXY SERVERS | LEE, GIL H | — |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18619453 | ADVANCED DATA COLLECTION BLOCK IDENTIFICATION | ALLEN, NICHOLAS E | 35d overdue |
| 18930741 | PROXY TRAFFIC OPTIMIZATION BY CACHING MEDIA RESOURCES | NGUYEN, LOAN T | — |
| 18732041 | SCRAPE TIME CALCULATOR | MOSER, BRUCE M | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18619453 | ADVANCED DATA COLLECTION BLOCK IDENTIFICATION | ALLEN, NICHOLAS E | 35d overdue |
| 18673840 | SELECTING AN EXIT-PROXY BY TCP/UDP PORT AT THE INGRESS-PROXY | BARKER, TODD L | 22d overdue |
| 19193451 | SELECTING MANAGED PROXY IP DEVICES BY GEOGRAPHICAL COORDINATES THEREOF | SERRAO, RANODHI N | — |
| 19098268 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS TO MAINTAIN MULTIPLE PERSISTENT CHANNELS BETWEEN PROXY SERVERS | LEE, GIL H | — |
| 18930741 | PROXY TRAFFIC OPTIMIZATION BY CACHING MEDIA RESOURCES | NGUYEN, LOAN T | — |
| 18732041 | SCRAPE TIME CALCULATOR | MOSER, BRUCE M | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2154 | 2 |
| 2447 | 1 |
| 2165 | 1 |
| 2449 | 1 |
| 2457 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19193451 | SELECTING MANAGED PROXY IP DEVICES BY GEOGRAPHICAL COORDINATES THEREOF | SERRAO, RANODHI N | 2447 | §102Other | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Apr 29, 2025 |
| 19098268 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS TO MAINTAIN MULTIPLE PERSISTENT CHANNELS BETWEEN PROXY SERVERS | LEE, GIL H | — | §102Other | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Apr 02, 2025 |
| 18930741 | PROXY TRAFFIC OPTIMIZATION BY CACHING MEDIA RESOURCES | NGUYEN, LOAN T | 2165 | §101§103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Oct 29, 2024 |
| 18732041 | SCRAPE TIME CALCULATOR | MOSER, BRUCE M | 2154 | §101 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Jun 03, 2024 |
| 18673840 | SELECTING AN EXIT-PROXY BY TCP/UDP PORT AT THE INGRESS-PROXY | BARKER, TODD L | 2449 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 22d overdue | Pending | May 24, 2024 |
| 18619453 | ADVANCED DATA COLLECTION BLOCK IDENTIFICATION | ALLEN, NICHOLAS E | 2154 | §101§103 | Final Rejection | 35d overdue | Pending | Mar 28, 2024 |
| 18431584 | TRAFFIC SERVICE THREADS FOR LARGE POOLS OF NETWORK ADDRESSES | OSMAN, RAMY M | 2457 | §103 | Final Rejection | 5d overdue | Pending | Feb 02, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial