Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Pacraft Co. Ltd. currently has 2 pending office actions in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These actions are assigned to 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units. SINGH, KAVEL is the busiest examiner for the company, holding 1 pending office action. The portfolio is split evenly, with 2 pending office actions distributed across 2 different examiners.
This means each examiner is responsible for exactly 1 action. The involvement of 2 distinct art units indicates that the pending matters fall into different specialized mechanical or transportation categories. Practitioners should prepare for two separate examination tracks, as there is no overlap in the personnel or the art units managing these 2 pending actions. The lack of concentration under SINGH, KAVEL means that no single examiner habits will dictate the outcome of the entire portfolio.
Strategy should be focused on the individual requirements of each art unit within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems area. The 2 pending office actions represent a set of challenges across the USPTO. Practitioners must manage 2 separate relationships and sets of examiner preferences across the 2 distinct art units. The outcome of the 2 pending office actions will impact the company intellectual property standing in the mechanical systems field.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (50%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| SINGH, KAVEL | 1 | 83.7% | +14.0% |
| TRAC, JONATHAN KHANH | 1 | — | — |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19091088 | LINEAR MOTOR CONVEYANCE SYSTEM AND LINEAR MOTOR CONVEYANCE METHOD | SINGH, KAVEL | — |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19040164 | CONTAINER PROCESSING APPARATUS AND CONTAINER PROCESSING METHOD | TRAC, JONATHAN KHANH | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19091088 | LINEAR MOTOR CONVEYANCE SYSTEM AND LINEAR MOTOR CONVEYANCE METHOD | SINGH, KAVEL | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3651 | 1 |
| 3653 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19091088 | LINEAR MOTOR CONVEYANCE SYSTEM AND LINEAR MOTOR CONVEYANCE METHOD | SINGH, KAVEL | 3651 | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Mar 26, 2025 |
| 19040164 | CONTAINER PROCESSING APPARATUS AND CONTAINER PROCESSING METHOD | TRAC, JONATHAN KHANH | 3653 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jan 29, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialPacraft Co. Ltd. has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 2 examiners.
Kavel Singh has the most, with 1 of Pacraft Co. Ltd.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
