Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
2 pending office actions • 0 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Pacraft Co. Ltd. currently has 2 pending office actions under review. These actions are distributed among 2 distinct examiners, with SINGH, KAVEL serving as the busiest examiner for the portfolio with 1 pending office action. The data indicates 0 distinct art units associated with these filings. With these pending office actions and multiple distinct examiners, the company is engaging with various points of contact at the patent office. This distribution requires the applicant to manage separate examination processes simultaneously. SINGH, KAVEL is responsible for 1 of the pending matters.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (50%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| SINGH, KAVEL | 1 | 83.7% | +14.0% |
| TRAC, JONATHAN KHANH | 1 | — | — |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19091088 | LINEAR MOTOR CONVEYANCE SYSTEM AND LINEAR MOTOR CONVEYANCE METHOD | SINGH, KAVEL | — |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19040164 | CONTAINER PROCESSING APPARATUS AND CONTAINER PROCESSING METHOD | TRAC, JONATHAN KHANH | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19091088 | LINEAR MOTOR CONVEYANCE SYSTEM AND LINEAR MOTOR CONVEYANCE METHOD | SINGH, KAVEL | — |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19091088 | LINEAR MOTOR CONVEYANCE SYSTEM AND LINEAR MOTOR CONVEYANCE METHOD | SINGH, KAVEL | — | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Mar 26, 2025 |
| 19040164 | CONTAINER PROCESSING APPARATUS AND CONTAINER PROCESSING METHOD | TRAC, JONATHAN KHANH | — | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jan 29, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial