Technology areas: Communications • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
14 pending office actions • 12 art units • 14 examiners • 0 of 14 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 23 patents granted in the last 365 days
Paige.ai Inc. has 13 pending office actions in Communications. The matters involve 13 distinct examiners and 11 distinct art units. The examiner count indicates separate examiner assignments for each reported matter, while the art-unit count shows that some technical examination settings recur.
LEE, ANDREW ELDRIDGE is the busiest examiner, with 1 pending matter. The data shows no concentration around a single examiner. Counsel should coordinate portfolio-wide claim themes where useful, while tailoring responses to the individual examiner and art unit.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 3 (21%) |
| §103 only | 8 (57%) |
| §102 only | 1 (7%) |
| §112 only | 1 (7%) |
| Double-patenting only | 1 (7%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| LEE, ANDREW ELDRIDGE | 1 | 16.8% | +31.5% |
| SANGHERA, STEVEN G.S. | 1 | 30.3% | +29.7% |
| AGAHI, DARIOUSH | 1 | 84.0% | +30.3% |
| GARCIA, PAULO ANDRES | 1 | 78.8% | +27.8% |
| THOMAS, MIA M | 1 | 86.2% | +15.8% |
| TORRES, JOSE | 1 | 82.0% | +12.2% |
| TALUKDER, MD K | 1 | 80.1% | +14.1% |
| JIA, XIN | 1 | 84.6% | +13.0% |
| TSAI, TSUNG YIN | 1 | 81.6% | +11.6% |
| GARCIA, SANTIAGO | 1 | 87.9% | +13.6% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19178243 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DATA PARSING USING LARGE LANGUAGE MODEL | AGAHI, DARIOUSH | — |
| 19028824 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROCESSING IMAGES TO DETERMINE IMAGE-BASED COMPUTATIONAL BIOMARKERS FROM LIQUID SPECIMENS | THOMAS, MIA M | — |
| 19001019 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROCESSING ELECTRONIC IMAGES FOR GENERALIZED DISEASE DETECTION | TORRES, JOSE | — |
| 18950396 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO PROCESS ELECTRONIC IMAGES TO IDENTIFY ATTRIBUTES | TALUKDER, MD K | — |
| 18948792 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE POWERED MOLECULAR WORKFLOW VERIFYING SLIDE AND BLOCK QUALITY FOR TESTING | JIA, XIN | — |
| 18916458 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO PROCESS ELECTRONIC IMAGES TO DETERMINE SALIENT INFORMATION IN DIGITAL PATHOLOGY | TSAI, TSUNG YIN | — |
| 18908015 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROCESSING IMAGES OF SLIDES TO AUTOMATICALLY PRIORITIZE THE PROCESSED IMAGES OF SLIDES FOR DIGITAL PATHOLOGY | GARCIA, SANTIAGO | — |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17877319 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROCESSING ELECTRONIC IMAGES IN FORENSIC PATHOLOGY | HIGGS, STELLA EUN | 12d |
| 19330070 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ANALYSIS OF MULTI-RESOLUTION IMAGES | LEE, ANDREW ELDRIDGE | — |
| 19318866 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR HIGH-THROUGHPUT PAN-CANCER GENETIC AND PHENOTYPIC BIOMARKER SCREENING | SANGHERA, STEVEN G.S. | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19330070 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ANALYSIS OF MULTI-RESOLUTION IMAGES | LEE, ANDREW ELDRIDGE | — |
| 19318866 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR HIGH-THROUGHPUT PAN-CANCER GENETIC AND PHENOTYPIC BIOMARKER SCREENING | SANGHERA, STEVEN G.S. | — |
| 19178243 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DATA PARSING USING LARGE LANGUAGE MODEL | AGAHI, DARIOUSH | — |
| 19073876 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROCESSING ELECTRONIC IMAGES OF CORES | GARCIA, PAULO ANDRES | — |
| 19028824 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROCESSING IMAGES TO DETERMINE IMAGE-BASED COMPUTATIONAL BIOMARKERS FROM LIQUID SPECIMENS | THOMAS, MIA M | — |
| 19001019 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROCESSING ELECTRONIC IMAGES FOR GENERALIZED DISEASE DETECTION | TORRES, JOSE | — |
| 18950396 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO PROCESS ELECTRONIC IMAGES TO IDENTIFY ATTRIBUTES | TALUKDER, MD K | — |
| 18948792 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE POWERED MOLECULAR WORKFLOW VERIFYING SLIDE AND BLOCK QUALITY FOR TESTING | JIA, XIN | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3684 | 2 |
| 2669 | 1 |
| 2665 | 1 |
| 2664 | 1 |
| 2648 | 1 |
| 2663 | 1 |
| 2656 | 1 |
| 2673 | 1 |
| 2667 | 1 |
| 1685 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19330070 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ANALYSIS OF MULTI-RESOLUTION IMAGES | LEE, ANDREW ELDRIDGE | 3684 | §101§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Sep 16, 2025 |
| 19318866 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR HIGH-THROUGHPUT PAN-CANCER GENETIC AND PHENOTYPIC BIOMARKER SCREENING | SANGHERA, STEVEN G.S. | 3684 | §101§102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Sep 04, 2025 |
| 19178243 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DATA PARSING USING LARGE LANGUAGE MODEL | AGAHI, DARIOUSH | — | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Apr 14, 2025 |
| 19073876 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROCESSING ELECTRONIC IMAGES OF CORES | GARCIA, PAULO ANDRES | 2669 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Mar 07, 2025 |
| 19028824 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROCESSING IMAGES TO DETERMINE IMAGE-BASED COMPUTATIONAL BIOMARKERS FROM LIQUID SPECIMENS | THOMAS, MIA M | 2665 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jan 17, 2025 |
| 19001019 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROCESSING ELECTRONIC IMAGES FOR GENERALIZED DISEASE DETECTION | TORRES, JOSE | 2664 | DP | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 24, 2024 |
| 18950396 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO PROCESS ELECTRONIC IMAGES TO IDENTIFY ATTRIBUTES | TALUKDER, MD K | 2648 | §102 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Nov 18, 2024 |
| 18948792 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE POWERED MOLECULAR WORKFLOW VERIFYING SLIDE AND BLOCK QUALITY FOR TESTING | JIA, XIN | 2663 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Nov 15, 2024 |
| 18916458 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO PROCESS ELECTRONIC IMAGES TO DETERMINE SALIENT INFORMATION IN DIGITAL PATHOLOGY | TSAI, TSUNG YIN | 2656 | §103Other | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Oct 15, 2024 |
| 18908015 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROCESSING IMAGES OF SLIDES TO AUTOMATICALLY PRIORITIZE THE PROCESSED IMAGES OF SLIDES FOR DIGITAL PATHOLOGY | GARCIA, SANTIAGO | 2673 | §103Other | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Oct 07, 2024 |
| 18179871 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO PROCESS ELECTRONIC IMAGES FOR MODEL SELECTION | JONES, ANDREW B | 2667 | §112 | Final Rejection | 8d overdue | Pending | Mar 07, 2023 |
| 18051304 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROCESSING ELECTRONIC IMAGES TO DETERMINE ONCOGENIC SIGNALS | SCHULTZHAUS, JANNA NICOLE | 1685 | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Oct 31, 2022 |
| 18049220 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO PROCESS ELECTRONIC IMAGES FOR DETERMINING TREATMENT | CADEAU, WEDNEL | 2632 | §103 | Final Rejection | 18d overdue | Pending | Oct 24, 2022 |
| 17877319 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROCESSING ELECTRONIC IMAGES IN FORENSIC PATHOLOGY | HIGGS, STELLA EUN | 3681 | §101§103§112 | Final Rejection | 12d | Pending | Jul 29, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialPaige.ai Inc. has 14 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 12 art units and 14 examiners.
Andrew Eldridge Lee has the most, with 1 of Paige.ai Inc.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Communications (USPTO Tech Center 2600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
